I’m using Connect and it’s broken for me to. I wonder if it’s just MD with underscores that’s broken?

test (underscore)
bold test (underscore s)
test
bold test

EDIT: it wasn’t that. This works, at least for me

One must at least imagine Sisyphus happy, even under such circumstances

Or gets stuck in a loop

I’d also very much like someone to explain what this is

That probably doesn’t count as “AI” do… It’s more a very bad form of compression (that may very well make the image file larger)

It’s very much possible and indeed such a problem that it may be done by mistake if a large enough data set isn’t used (see overfitting). A model trained to output just this one image will learn to do so and over time it should learn to do it with 100% accuracy. The model would simply learn to ignore whatever arbitrary inputs you’ve given it

Why does it split nerve system and the brain apart? And what are all the lines connecting to the brain?

I don’t really know, that might be true in some places but not here in Sweden. We have public service TV and radio that’s free and add free. OFC the don’t have everything and you’ll probably end up watching things from other places anyways but it at least decreases the class divide.

However things on the internet are still as true. Not because it’s that hard to use a add blocker but it’s still mostly tech sawy people that do.

who needs imagination when you have algorithms to do the thinking for you? 😜

This was chat GPTs attempt at writing a funny reply to this post.

Steve Steve

(Minecraft Steve)

Add steve just below Steve Wallis

Yes i know it’s gibberish but from my understanding all of the words are reall Latin words and therefore I feel like I should be able to translate it to English with Google translate. But of course I’m aware that I’m giving it nonsense input and so I should expect nonsense as output, which is what I got.

Or, for those weird people who don’t speak Latin (like, imagine not speaking Latin) here is the quote in English:

It is important to take care of the patient, to be followed by the patient, but it will happen at such a time that there is a lot of work and pain. There was also some desire for chocolate. And now the ligula ullamcorper of the free fruit is sometimes varied. I am in no position to worry about any basketball shootings. A great bed of mourning. It is convenient for someone to finance a mass of developers. In arcu cursus euismod quis viverra nibh tomorrow pulvinar mattis Mauris pellentesque pulvinar pellentesque inhabitant morbi sad senectus. It is important to pursue the education of the people who live in the disease. It is a very smart thing to do.

And I can’t make that joke now ): (but it was kinda obvious too)

You’ve become the intolerant. You can’t tolerate that.

Thanks!

I’m not OP so I can’t be completely sure what thing that is but as a Swede I can recommend Ikea’s blåhaj

(Also could you please explain the whole blåhaj thing, I’m confused)

Yeah the 2024 edition was kinda lame

ok

I’m just as you not a physesist but I’m still gonna take a bet at correcting you.

From what I know the “constantly moving” thing you to talked about is wrong (but the particles are probably always moving). I think what you where trying to get at is the fact that you can not measure a particles movement and position at the same time.¹

Those small quantum particles are not described by a position and a movement vector like normal objects but are instead described by a probability field, a so called “wave function”. This function describes the probability that a particle is at a given position at a given time.² When two particles interact there waves merge and there now described by one wave (I have no idea how that works). Those particles then become “entangled” and share certain attributes.³ This is what happens with Schrödingers cat, the cat is entangled with the cat killing mechanism in the box. The cat can then be described by a probability thingy yielding not a absolute state for the cat but the probability that the cat is dead/alive.

There are many theories for how those values should be translated into the absolute world we see. One of those theories is, as you said, the Copenhagen theory. It states that when observerad all particles choose a state based on their wave function. It was, as you said, this theory that Schrödinger was arguing against.⁴ My favourite theory (based on its name) is the “shut up and calculate” theory.²

1. Uncertainty principle - Swedish Wikipedia
2. quantum mechanics- Swedish Wikipedia
3. Quantum entanglement - Swedish Wikipedia
4. “Parallels worlds probably exist. Here is why” - versarium YT

yes I just cited three articles in Swedish. but all of them should be available in English to :-)