Oh no, I do know it is actual dissent circulating, but every now and then it’s good to remind people that for some reason Mr Xi Jinping hates the damn stupid comparison with a cartoon bear. And it is actual dissent, since they’ve actually temporarily blocked queries on Baidu for such The Poo, Winnie
- 0 Posts
- 95 Comments
China forced Apple to only allow airdrop to all for a few minutes at a time, as apparently it was a popular way to spread Winnie the Pooh pictures
I mean Lincoln and Washingmachine weren’t too bad
Wait… why would you have a camera on a phone??? Are they trying to spy on you??
I gotta say, I love the fact I learned this through a comedian, who actually is literate and went through the work of reading and realising the answer is right there
Usually used by people who think it is adequate to respond to words that hurt their feelings with physical violence
Less well known [than other paradoxes] is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be most unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal. Karl Popper, 2 sentences after defining the paradox of tolerance he shows an easy answer to it. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance
I just hear buzzwords “kubernetes! Scalable! Docker! AI performance! Latency! Enterprise! Reliable! DATABASE! MangoDB MariaDB! SQLite!
I have an excuse though. Doctor is closer to doutor (male doctor) than doutora (female doctor)
He just gotta have a curly moustache
c/accidentalrenaissance@blahaj.zone
Compatibility reasons with legacy code, and still more simple than the new beta software. Encourages further propagation of the software downstream through easier reproduction and simpler creation of child processes
Same here. As fun as it might be trying out another gender, it’s far too complicated, and I’d rather mess with NixOS
Not necessarily fptp. Portugal had broadly proportional representation and is seeing an increase in far right
Wow, just gotta say, I can’t believe my English became bad enough to be mistaken as an American