That’s an awfully big butt plug

Sounds like you have a problem

Interesting little fact: a factoid is not a little fact, it’s something that appears like a fact but is in fact false. Think like how an android is a fake human, a factoid is a fake fact.

Are the characters in the game fairly small in a world of humans? Just wondering why the floor planks look so big

It’s missing the Uhaul

I’ve never thought of using papier-mâché this way! So cool.

You could probably paint or lacquer it too to add some extra water resistance if needed.

Not AI, just fake the old fashioned way; it’s a staged “social experiment”

This should have a spoiler tag

Well now I wanna see a Lisa Frank vinyl wrapped Cybertruck

What about my femboy ahegao vinyl wrap?

Having the separate items broken up across lines without punctuation doesn’t help

Possibly. The really water-injected stuff is often frozen so that probably doesn’t help for sure.

Eh, in my experience this chicken has a weird texture so not really

Interestingly, in Canada “high tea” is a fancy afternoon tea with little sandwiches and desserts. Often something you can book at posh hotels like Fairmonts.

Sorry, I’m bumping up against Poe’s Law with this comment so I think I’m misunderstanding your point.

I don’t own a subway, it’s not my organisation. I was just using my imagination to put myself in the shoes of others to understand their decisions.

Now then: You’re literally stating that having homeless people in a space causes social harm, and that making a place less hospitable for the homeless, even if it improves that place for its main function, is also a societal bad. Let’s accept that for the sake of argument. Why are the homeless camping in the subway? Doesn’t that mean they’ve already passed down from further up this displacement chain and the subway is also a victim of the same thing?

The subway and the homeless are both just dealing with their situations in the best ways they can. Asking the subway to house the homeless in their corridors is about as helpful as just telling those homeless people to stop being homeless.

No, I was being a bit facetious in my response to the comment that the solution is housing the homeless, not making things less hospitable. It’s of course not within the Subway’s powers to actually solve homelessness so giving them flack for picking the less worse option with their limited options instead of magically solving the root of the problem is silly.

Get mad at the people who are actually responsible for dealing with the root cause, not the ones needing to make tough choices dealing with the reality of it.

I agree with you almost completely. The issue is if the homeless prevents the space from being suitable for disabled people or other commuters, then this is the “less worse” option from the subway’s perspective. The subway is focused on creating a safe and clean commuter environment; it’s not within their power to solve homelessness so they have little choice but to make everything a bit worse for everyone to stop the problem they’re dealing with from making it even worse yet for everyone.

You think the subway should house the homeless?

You need to know the rules in order to break them