• JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 day ago

    Funny thing is, everything below data centers contribute more value to society than data centers.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Everybody stop investing in everything important and invest in this giant ponzo scheme!

    Everyone who claims to be an economist.

    Everyone who claims to be an investor.

    Everyone who claims to understand business.

    Couldn’t stop this? Remember this when these experts claim to understand the economy and know what is best for you and I. They are full of shit.

    • ikt@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      why did you link to this? building a lot of dc’s isn’t dutch disease

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s an increase in economic development of a single sector at the expense of the rest of the economy. You’ll notice all the other bars on that graph are showing declines while the data center build-out is booming.

        Production is shifting away from the rest of the lagging economy into booming data center development (resource movement effect), and at the same time, all those resources being moved is also triggering movements in labor demand towards providing services to the booming sector (spending effect). We also see USD appreciating and exchange rates going up.

        It looks a lot like Dutch disease.

        • ikt@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think that’s one way of putting it but i’m not sure how every other boom couldn’t also be named dutch disease by the same metric

          The mechanism behind it is:

          The presumed mechanism is that while revenues increase in a growing sector (or inflows of foreign aid), the given economy’s currency becomes stronger (“appreciates”) compared to foreign currencies (manifested in the exchange rate). This results in the country’s other exports becoming more expensive for other countries, while imports become cheaper, rendering those sectors less competitive.

          —-

          the reason i have to wonder is because this is a graph on internal construction spending and I don’t know what “ai exports” look like nor the currency appreciation because of it

          Which this guy also mentions:

          The analogy has limits, however. Classic Dutch disease works largely through a stronger currency that undermines exporters, whereas the AI version, as Thompson frames it, operates through competition for scarce inputs. AI could also eventually lift productivity across the wider economy, a benefit a gas discovery never offered. Other forces are at work too, notably energy prices driven higher by the Iran war, which add to electricity costs and inflation independently of AI demand.

          Whether the diagnosis holds will depend on data still to come. Electricity prices, wage figures and the pace of AI-linked corporate bond issuance are the measures most likely to show whether the boom is crowding out the rest of the economy or eventually lifting it.

          https://investinglive.com/news/is-ai-giving-the-us-economy-a-case-of-dutch-disease-from-dutch-gas-to-american-chips/

          Maybe have to invent a new term, us disease or something

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Other booms don’t necessarily cause contraction in the rest of the economy. That’s what the bar graph is showing, it isn’t just showing that there’s a lot of data center construction, it’s showing that construction of everything else is falling.

            It definitely might be a new thing, though, because AI doesn’t actually create value. In other resource booms, oil or lithium or whatever, there’s a real material thing being sold for profit. With AI, there aren’t even any profits. It’s just gobbling investment.

            It’s definitely strange.

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Not least because of climate change acceleration from the extreme carbon output increase from those things.