Yes, I did actually get a BSOD from that, no it wasn’t my PC

  • bonn2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Don’t even get me started on their implementation of .7z files, it is so incredibly slow compared to the actual 7zip program

  • Dasnap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Um actuwally modern Windows is based off the Windows NT kernel that isn’t 30 years old 🤓

    Still from the early 2000s though so it’s no excuse.

    Edit: I am spreading misinformation online :3 I was thinking of its mainline Windows release.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Early 90s, NT 3.1 was released in 93. By release date, nearly 31 years old. First version that a significant number of people actually used was 4.0, 96, and the first consumers used was 2000. Development started in 89, as OS/2 3.0, then still a joint project with IBM.

      For comparison, the first public Linux version dates to 91, 1.0 to 94, though Unix of course goes back to 69. Practically the only other thing still surviving from that era are IBM mainframes. In CS terms both are prehistorical, you can tell by how papers from back then aren’t typeset in TeX, worse, are usually scans. Yet they somehow had it all pretty much already figured out and we’re now often re-discovering insights that they simply didn’t have the hardware to implement back then. Not impossible to implement back then but here’s a fun one. And a modern walk-through through the thing.