I need to generate a number of scripts in my configuration and make them into a single package (for ease of reference, because there are a lot of them).

So far, I’m creating the scripts via writeShellApplication, making them into packages via an overlay, merging them with buildEnv and then adding the resulting package to `systemPackages.

Something like:

nixpkgs.overlays = [ (final: prev: {
  my-hello-1 = final.writeShellApplication {
    name = "my-hello-1-script";
    text = "echo my hello wolrd 1";
  };
  my-hello-2 = final.writeShellApplication {
    name = "my-hello-2-script";
    text = "echo my hello wolrd 1";
  };
  my-hello-scripts = final.buildEnv {
    name = "my-hello-scripts";
    paths = [ final.my-hello-1 final.my-hello-2 ];
  };
}) ];

environment.systemPackages = [ pkgs.my-hello-scripts ];

This works, but I don’t really need the my-hello-1 and my-hello-2 packages… can you think of a way to make do without needing them?

  • gomp@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Well, it does work as-is, and it’s not like I’m worried how many symlinks need to be dereerenced… the point is mainly that my nix code could be much simpler if I didn’t have to build the overlay attrset like that from a list.

    • hallettj@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You might simplify it a bit with something like,

      let my-hello-scripts = [
        (writeShellApplication {
          name = "my-hello-1-script";
          text = "echo my hello world 1";
        })
        (writeShellApplication {
          name = "my-hello-2-script";
          text = "echo my hello world 2";
        })
      ];
      in
      {
        environment.systemPackages = 
          my-hello-scripts ++
          [ pkgs.whatever-else-you-want ];
      }
      
      • gomp@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That was my first idea (well, I say “my”… but it was really suggested by yourself in the question I posted the other day), but it results in nixos complaining that error: A definition for option 'environment.systemPackages."[definition 1-entry 1]"' is not of type 'package'.

        It might very well be that I’m doing some stupid mistake here (or maybe it’s something that used to work and doesn’t anymore?)… here’s what I used to test it out:

          environment.systemPackages = [
            pkgs.writeShellApplication {
              name = "some-script";
              text = "echo hello wolrd";
            }
          ];
        

        Edit:

        And indeed I was the one doing stupid things: it must be

          environment.systemPackages = [
            (pkgs.writeShellApplication {
              name = "some-script";
              text = "echo hello wolrd";
            })
          ];
        

        with the parentheses, or it’s a list with two elements (a function and an attrset)…