The Picard Maneuver@piefed.world to Data is Beautiful@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoPassenger deaths per 1 billion passenger miles (2000-2009)media.piefed.worldimagemessage-square173linkfedilinkarrow-up1326arrow-down117
arrow-up1309arrow-down1imagePassenger deaths per 1 billion passenger miles (2000-2009)media.piefed.worldThe Picard Maneuver@piefed.world to Data is Beautiful@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square173linkfedilink
minus-squarecron@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up40arrow-down1·3 months agoHours of travel time would likely be a good fit too.
minus-squarePup Biru@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down1·3 months agohours doesn’t come as close to the metric that you’d like though the purpose of travel is to get from point a to point b, so you want to measure the likelihood of death when travelling the comparable trips hours doesn’t really work because different modes of transport complete the trip in very different times. distance however is relatively similar
minus-squarechunkystyles@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoExcept that a short trip is less risk exposure than a long trip.
minus-squaresem@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoA plane isn’t as versatile though. You can’t go everywhere on a plane, train, or (to a lesser extent) bus, but you can in a car, motorcycle, or if you’re committed, bicycle.
Hours of travel time would likely be a good fit too.
hours doesn’t come as close to the metric that you’d like though
the purpose of travel is to get from point a to point b, so you want to measure the likelihood of death when travelling the comparable trips
hours doesn’t really work because different modes of transport complete the trip in very different times. distance however is relatively similar
Except that a short trip is less risk exposure than a long trip.
A plane isn’t as versatile though. You can’t go everywhere on a plane, train, or (to a lesser extent) bus, but you can in a car, motorcycle, or if you’re committed, bicycle.