• 0 Posts
  • 11 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle



  • Dangdoggo@kbin.socialto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Because websites will check if you have a Web Integrity token being sent along by the browser and if it cannot find one registrations and login will be closed to your instance.

    Edit: And to clarify, you will not get that token unless you verify your identity within the associated google account. Hence why only Chromium browsers will support this. But it isn’t about the browser. It’s about the token.


  • Dangdoggo@kbin.socialto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    The ‘average’ website wouldn’t but many of the social giants are desperately looking for a way to limit bot use. So Google gives them what they want and simultaneously gets to be the most reliable advertiser, ensuring impressions are viewed by not just a human but the right human.


  • Dangdoggo@kbin.socialto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s the API itself, it’s a little more complicated than just checking if you have a chromium browser. What it’s looking for is special tokens generated by google within chromium browsers. Google is selling this idea as a way to help verify identity of the end user and thus block bots. That’s concerning, because it suggests that google will have some verification method likely involving ID and generate a unique token with that info associated with it. This is a real concern for web privacy for like a million reasons, obviously, and ideally should not be adopted by anyone. If other tech gatekeepers adopt it (and they would love to) it will block giant swathes of the internet from people refusing to use the tech and further googles monopoly over general consumer browser use. Now, could the token be fudged? Possibly. But it will take time to figure out.



  • “intuitiveness is objective and measurable” is such a hilarious thing to say. Like yes it’s possible to measure how quickly people can come to understand an app but to say that, therefore, we have an objective understanding of ‘intuitiveness’ and can say “Hamburger menu instead of kebab menu here??? That is O B J E C T I V E L Y unintuitive” is sooo fucking silly.