• 0 Posts
  • 50 Comments
Joined 7 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 16th, 2024

help-circle




  • Dasus@lemmy.worldto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneAutocorrect Rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Women are so cute and I don’t know what to do with the kids and I don’t know if I can do anything with them or something like that and withholding made it to the end of the day so I can continue to do it for you to comprehend what I do and I don’t know how to do it to you or not I just don’t want to be a knob you had to lift my hands and get it done and I can see you in a bit of a time and I hope you have a good day and enjoy your day and enjoy your day and enjoy your day and enjoy your day and enjoy your day and enjoy your day and enjoy your day and enjoy your day and enjoy your day and enjoy your day.

    I don’t have kids either. That’s probably why neither of us know what to do with them?


  • Well, have you given thought to how angry it makes you when moronic terfs oversimplify and exaggerate?

    Do you actually think someone should kill themselves. Answer like you would in real life, as if you then had to watch that person killing themselves.

    Anyone who’s an adult and even somewhat not-sociopathic should know that while it’s very attractive to say “yes I want these bad people to kill themselves”, it’s a slippery slope and deep down the answer is “no, not really really”. It’s pretty much the exact rhetoric that starts movements that end up in fascism or some other totalitarianism. “Those people need to go!”


  • I mean, you can’t advocate for people to kill themselves.

    It doesn’t matter if you say kys for world peace, even if it was true and someone was sacrificing themselves for the world.

    Just can’t say that.

    Usually you can use euphemisms though.

    But yeah Reddit is shit I got similarly banned, but for even milder language, when — I assume — Israeli’s mass flagged my comment, and I had had previous warnings over similar things.

    It doesn’t really even matter though if you use even mild language if the intent is there and some astroturfing group decides to mass report a comment.

    When it’s like dozens of reports on a single comment, the lazy fuckers over at Reddit simply don’t care and ban you.




  • “New definition”?

    Oh my sweet summer child, just because you’re hearing about it only now doesn’t mean this difference in sex and gender is new.

    No, no, no.

    It’s older than the written word,

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_gender#History

    In Mesopotamian mythology, among the earliest written records of humanity, there are references to types of people who are not men and not women.

    Also, you don’t seem to understand the scientific side of the biological effects of HRT.

    No, transitioning doesn’t change your DNA. No-one has argued it does. This doesn’t even remotely mean trans women are men or trans men women, and to make the argument that XY-people are all men or XX-people all women is to literally deny science, like a Flat Earther.


  • That is the science, gender is a part of this makeup

    I refer you to the image I posted earlier.

    Here, have it again.

    #Sex refers to “the different biological and physiological characteristics of males and females, such as reproductive organs, chromosomes, hormones, etc.” Gender refers to "the socially constructed characteristics of women and men – such as norms, roles and relationships of and between groups of women and men.

    I’m afraid you just might be cognitively incapable of understanding that sex is different from gender.

    Like trying to teach a dog to whistle, this.


  • a brown eye tortured into become blue

    Your English rather poor, comrade. Better practice front of mirror more times.

    If you’re born Vladimir, but you move to the West where no-one knows it, and you introduce yourself as Robert and everyone calls you Robert, are you not then Robert?

    Gender is not in your DNA silly. That’s the whole “gender is different from sex” that’s the scientific consensus. You said you rely on science, yet now you argue your brainfarts are more valid than consensus of the entire scientific community?


  • Perhaps a misunderstanding due to societies recent attempt at broadening the concepts of sex and gender

    No, not at all.

    There’s no “mudding the waters”, he’s just ignorant of what “sexual dimorphism” meant, and not clever enough to check it before leaving a most ironic comment about “making it sexual”.

    You mean “muddying the waters”, by the way. Another example of your ignorance.

    I’ll stick with what can be tested, reproduced and proven

    Don’t lie. You’re very much writing like a “only two genders and I don’t see how ‘sex’ and ‘gender’ are different despite there being a very clear scientific consensus on it” - guy.