Beautiful analysis!
Beautiful analysis!
“But doctor”, the soldier said. “I am sewer man”
Didn’t you see yesterdays announcement?
It hasn’t finished uploading yet
The newly appointed judges who helped overturn the decision also specifically stated in their confirmation hearings that Roe v. Wade was settled law: https://www.factcheck.org/2022/05/what-gorsuch-kavanaugh-and-barrett-said-about-roe-at-confirmation-hearings/
Not officially, but unofficially there’s 2A0, 4A0 and so on. Bigger than that is rarely used however.
I fucking love that somebody put in the time to draw that awesome first image. Somebody pretty darn talented saw the bottom image and thought “yeah, that would be cool” and took hours to produce that image. Amazing
This is very specific, but I can’t read that without having to think of the fight against the Dung Defender in Hollow Knight…
FÖÖÖÖR HUUUUUNDAAAAARRRRR!
Who are you, who are so wise in the ways of science?
You do lose details in the sense of how much attention everything on screen gets. When looking at something, you don’t process everything in your FoV equally - for example you don’t notice lower resolutions outside your focus area.
Ah, good!
I feel like there is a fundamental difference between developers with a data-centric perspective, and a function-centric perspective.
The function-centric one is about adding functionality, and it’s what developers start out with. You have functions that do things, and if requirements change or the thing should be re-used - no problem, I can quickly add a new toggle parameter here or bolt it on over there. I’ll be done in 5 minutes, no problem!
Then, over time, you learn that functionality isn’t that interesting or difficult. Instead, the hard parts are the ones concerning the flow of data through your application. What do I know about the shape of my data in this part of my application? What can I be sure of regarding invariants over there? This forces you to build modular software without interdependencies, because - in the end - you just build a library that has small adapters to the outside world.
I like scripting languages a lot, but it’s way too easy to become “good” at that style of programming, and the better you get at it, the harder it will be to actually move forward to a data-centric perspective. It’s a local maximum that can trap people, sometimes for their whole career. That’s why I try to look at typing experience when evaluating candidates for positions.
I’d change this slightly - the problem isn’t exclusively working in scripting languages, but dynamically typed ones. There are people who write great code in Python (with typing) and in Typescript, and they usually can work well in other languages too. But people who don’t type their programs are in my experience simply bad developers, the way you describe.
Even in open office arrangements, I prefer working in smaller rooms compared to bigger ones. This is literally the worst setup I could come up with.
What did wonders for me was putting a glass with a bit of white wine and dish soap on the counter. Only thing that worked.
It’s the other way around. For the other chores, he has to state that he’s doing evil versions. For showering it doesn’t have to be stated, since showering by itself is evil.
But sometimes life sucks, and then you keep living