Is it FOSS?

Wtf is that sus link?

Have you considered the third possibility that I mentioned? That it might be fake and for attention?

the sexual liberal partner

You’re aware that polyamorous relationships require clear communication and boundaries to not become abusive, correct? Just like monogamous ones do? From your word choice when talking about a potential cheater, I’m getting the impression that you don’t actually know what a healthy relationship is let alone what a healthy polyamorous relationship is.

…but judging by your other responses in this thread a productive conversation is not in the offing, so I’ll just end my part of it here and wish you a good day.

Making a lot of assumptions here.

The women standing in this picture could be in a polycule situation with the dude at the table and he could be stepping out on all of them with the seated woman. It could be a group of single women playing a mean-spirited prank on their friend’s lame first date. It could also be completely fake and made for attention.

I know there are a lot of monogamous people out there who talk shit about polyamory, largely out of ignorance or envy, but there’s no need to mirror that energy back at them. It won’t change their minds or stop the shit talk and it just increases the level of negativity surrounding the conversation. Remember, the sweetest revenge against your haters is to live your best life.

Cheating can happen in polyamorous relationships as well.

Maybe the real Verne was the friends we made along the way.

Infinite consequences for finite actions? Seems disproportionate.

One all knowing God who decided to sacrifice Himself to Himself to pay a price He wanted to pay.

We know it is eternal and irrevocable, and it is meant as punishment. Punishing someone eternally is immoral. There’s no way around that. It doesn’t matter what they did.

God is a fair judge, and he cant just let people off UNLESS someone else takes the punishment

Why not? Seriously. He set up the system. Why require punishment in that system? Jesus and God are the same person (hence “triune” ), so He essentially had us torture and kill Himself to appease His own vengeance.

He could have forgiven us without preconditions. He chose to require punishment. Then He chose to be tortured and killed . Now He demands that we thank him for it or He’ll punish us for eternity. That’s psychopath behavior.

he expressed the ultimate love to us on the Cross

By masochistically sacrificing Himself, to Himself, to pay a price He chose to charge of His own free will, in order to cleanse us of the “taint” of actions He considers sins.

For the sake of argument let’s assume what you believe happened happened and that your god is real. The problem with omnipotence is that you can’t blaim anyone else for the system you set up. The crucifixion didn’t need to happen to “free us from sin”, God wanted to incarnate into a mortal form and be tortured to death. Why? I cannot say, but He could have chosen some other way. He could choose to not threaten us with eternal torture simply for not loving Him. That isn’t love.

Oh, you somehow picked both options. Got it.

You brought it up during a discussion of morality and are surprised people are interpreting that as you making a moral judgement? Are you being purposely obtuse or accidentally stupid? It’s hard to tell online.

Solid Sammy right there

Anyone who claims to be undecided about whether trans people should exist is lying and sides with the transphobes.

The right is going to depict us as unsympathetic and violent no matter what we do. They feel no responsibility to the truth because the crowd they play to believes everything they say without question. Playing the good queer gets us nowhere. Their acceptance cannot be gained that way.

Nook never charges interest and gives you infinite time to pay him back with no threat of foreclosure, that makes him better than any other mortgage lender in existence.

The Nazi’s hand it covering it, but I assume that Bubsy is fully erect in this image.

That’s what I’m saying, yes.

Off topic but I hate that that phrase is backwards. If you have a cake you can eat that cake or you’re in the process of eating it (“having cake”). If you eat a cake you can’t then have it other than having it in your belly.

I know I’m being pedantic and off topic, but you’re getting downvote to hell so what’s it matter?

You say that like they only had one.

Lol go troll somewhere else

Translation: I have no argument

(Edit:formatting)

PETA are their own smear campaign. Their own ignorance and skewing facts to push a narrative are all I needed to not trust what they or any of their supporters have to say about animals.