Damn, just looked it up and he died during that film’s shooting. That sucks, he fuckin nailed that role.

Grape skin.

The revolver looks like one of the various Colt .38 snubnose revolvers used by police prior to the 1990s. They all had a very similar look.

Examples from this article:

Nonono I’m pretty sure that’s the article author, Matthew Rodriguez. /s

but maybe.

I view that aspect, the motive, as being added specifically to provide a reason for those who haven’t acquired empathy yet, Such as many children. If you simply say ‘don’t bully people for being different’ the immediate rebuttal will be ‘why not?’, and if you don’t give some concrete answer, then the lesson will potentially not stick.

These tenets of kindness and goodwill are most powerful and propagateable when concrete, calculated explanations can be provided on top of reasons which rely on empathy, because empathy works for some, but when empathy is lacking logic must suffice.

Pretty sure the moral was to not ostracize people for being different, because it might turn out you need their difference at some point.

However for the story to play out how it did, Rudolf had to be given less help against bullying than he should have been given.

Love me a good battered fry, but my go-to is shoestring. They air fry quite nicely.

For those who also couldn’t figure it out in your head, it’s apparently semaphore.

Nah, they’ll have him in the chair after one slide transition where his surprised frown stays on screen the whole time, and he’ll still be getting shocked intermittenly when it goes credits.

Aren’t the optional parts supposed to be in the parentheses? Like the portions you know are going into the pronoun should not be seperated from the text. So it’d be (s)(t)he(y) I think.

I do not know where you’re coming from here. Pinnochio wants to be a real boy. He’ll be what he eats, so he’s going to eat a real boy so he becomes one himself. Nothing about that matches curiosity or innocence. Pinnochio has a dasterdly, horrific plan, which he aims to enact. Sly is more apt, if not alittle understated.

All these stats are fantastic to see. Thank you for sharing!

Mountain lions cannot catch cats and dogs easily. Also, plenty of people would straight up murder mountain lion with a gun or their car to save a dog or cat.

Catch, Neuter, Release diminishes wild cat populations dramatically over just a couple generations, and it doesn’t involve having to facilitate their deaths.

Edit: I am a fan of the motorcycle idea. We should make sure they’re electric to cut down on their driving volume.

What’s this instance hosted on exactly? Does it have a blade server unit it works off or just a beefy home computer-adjacent system? Like I don’t need specs I’m just curious about what ballpark we’re in.

Petting cat > securing corporate profits

Him being a Nick Fuentes fan, and being more conservative because of that, does not then prove or support the idea that Mormons in general are more conservative than Republicans.

corporate punk

Those words meaning nothing together lol. Like saying upward down

It’s disruptive to the natural order to save prey from predator. Now that Truck-kun will go without a meal it would’ve gotten. It might even starve having missed that meal.

Incredibly irrisponsible behavior. Do not do this! Preserve the natural order so these habitats can continue in equilibrium!

This is essentially the Zionist stance.

It started with a view that ‘in order for Jews to escape persecution, an ethnostate for the Jewish faith must be established’. During this time it was still in contention within the movement on where Zion should be established, but it’s also noteable that independant zionist groups were buying land in Palestine for establishing Zion at the same time. This was during the time that Palestinians (and Arabs within the Ottoman empire in general) were helping the British with destabilizing the Ottoman empire under the agreement that these resistance groups would be given their land back from the Ottomans.

Then the Balfour Declaration occurred in 1917 which promised British support in making Palestine a safehaven for Jews, and shortly after the promise of giving Palestinians their land was reevaluated.

As tensions and conflict arose between the well-funded Zionist collective growing in Palestine and the Palestinian forces who wanted the Zionist project out of Palestine, a new tone ended up showing up in Zionist literature. A noteable essay, ‘The Iron Wall’ by Ze’ev Jabotinsky communicates that shift fairly well.

Zionist colonisation must either stop, or else proceed regardless of the native population. Which means that it can proceed and develop only under the protection of a power that is independent of the native population – behind an iron wall, which the native population cannot breach.

Essentially Ze’ev concludes in his essay that the Zionist project will fail unless it takes on a fully colonialist design. This was also just after Winston Churchill prohibited Zionists from settling on the East side of the Jordan River in 1923.

These are mostly snippets of the whole history, but it is essentially the trajectory we’ve followed since, from what I’ve read.

‘Wet’ is in reference to pussy juice I think. That’s the best guess I’ve got. I’ll let Cunningham’s Law do it’s thing here.