Again, you are only demonstrating how withered and underdeveloped your idea of germ theory is…
Do you think germs live well on a mostly sterile surface that contains no food or biological material? Or literally ON biological material?
You’re not even making arguments about how the food itself can be contaminated, or that behavioral patterns can make the glove harder to notice when it gets dirty. No… they’re just equivalent… fucking pathetic thought process, there bud.
lol voted down for telling people to be more responsible… Seems Lemmy is hardly a wiser place than Reddit.
They are, in fact, NOT “as clean as each other”. That is stupid and what I said still directly refutes that stupid thought.
You can cite “conventional wisdom” all you want.
It will NEVER. EVER make skin less germ-prone than a fresh glove. Obstinance doesn’t make you right. It makes you a fool.
That wasn’t my point. Good job failing at reading comprehension.
Well, that’s because it’s the marketing and exec hacks (read: morons) that decided to call it “AI”. Any engineer with a quarter of a braincell left knows better than to call the current generation (or the next several) of ML models et. al. “intelligent”, let alone AI.
An actual AI would be far, FAR more than capable of sorting your silly preferences.
Not being desirable can also solely be a lack of positives.
“… in a way that makes them desirable as actual adults.”
FTFY.
Good job opposing … checks notes … food and health safety rules…
Genuinely, pathetic.
Removed by mod
Oh they’ll be putting “AI” on it as your personal agent soon enough. Undoubtedly already have pushed it through many black box algorithms and machine learning models, so arguably too late.
They aren’t following health codes and should be reported. People not following rules IS NOT evidence for those rules being useless.
Or do you think murder should be legal because some do it anyways?
Wrong. Skin has FAR more crevices than gloves, has more bacteria naturally on it, and has literal body fluid coming off of it.
If you think skin is as sanitary as gloves, you are a moron who knows nothing of basic germ theory or the foggiest idea of how gross biology is.
I think they fairly qualified their joke to indicate that they are explicitly excluding sarcasm from the scenario.
Though agreed that a good sarcastic or sardonic joke can be a great callout.
Liver filters out a lot more than kidneys. Perhaps not by weight if you include the water that comes with urea et. al., but the liver deserves the respect.
Yea, that movie didn’t really explore the problems well, more of just made fun of the whole situation. I liked it about 1/5th as much as most, apparently.
The codec used for transmission is a tiny part of the production pipeline. Perhaps it is publishers choosing to mostly push lesser quality to YouTube, or videos uploaded before they started using better codecs, or any number of reasons.
The truth still stands that YouTube’s videos (at keast almost) universally have shitty audio quality.
Besides, look at it this way: YouTube can be accessed for free. Why would the publishers want to push a perfect replacement for buying the music on a free platform? They’d make less money.
You would be correct IF the post wasn’t literally and directly asking for women to behave the same as all the problems in patriarchy…
Learn to fucking read before you put others down. The post is a joke but you unironically defending matriarchy based on a joke that is asking for toxic matriarchy is not a joke. Do better.
Wasn’t the matriarchy in the barby movie done specifically to parody the patriarchy in real life?
They aren’t so much advocating for it as using it as an obvious 1 to 1 allegory.
Cherry picking to sound smart. Besides, your hand is literally biology that can not only absorb chemicals, put puts off chemicals of its own. You’re just plain wrong, and your obstinance is pathetic.