minus-squareNash42@programming.devto196@lemmy.blahaj.zone•Rulationship with Realitylinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agoAgreed and well-put. Lack of evidence cannot give creedence to a claim. It’s all well and good to believe in (the absence of, or possibility of) supernatural being(s), but to state such beliefs as objective is not follow the scientific method. linkfedilink
minus-squareNash42@programming.devto196@lemmy.blahaj.zone•Rulationship with Realitylinkfedilinkarrow-up9·11 months agoWhat evidence do you have to back up that claim? linkfedilink
Agreed and well-put. Lack of evidence cannot give creedence to a claim. It’s all well and good to believe in (the absence of, or possibility of) supernatural being(s), but to state such beliefs as objective is not follow the scientific method.