What is it supposed to say? “Tailor swift” on Wikipedia just redirects to “Taylor Swift”

When real life does not match up with the description given by social rejects on a site notorious for infidelity

It can save people. I’m saying it doesn’t always do that and occasionally it works the other way around. It is not a binary “yes” or “no”.

But if we have the opportunity to trade a robber for an evangelist, then I’ll take that trade any day. Robbers actively hurt society as their dayjob. Evangelists at most just talk and vote annoyingly (depending on your political views)

You can call it misplaced, unfunny, or naïve but I don’t think there’s anything inherently wrong with it. Plenty of people in prison use religion as a means of self-improvement and then wrench themselves back onto the straight path after their release.

(I feel that if I don’t say “an equal number of people use religion as a justification for evil deeds” someone will mention it. Religion doesn’t make you a good person in itself. It’s your actions that decide that and religion is a means to that.)

I watched a few episodes of a Beyblade anime with my younger brother and it felt a lot like a dry attempt to make a product more popular by thinking that they can just do a similar thing to Pokemon and get similar results.

I didn’t think the writing was very good.

He used it in the context that whenever either me or my brother complained to him about something, it was because both parties usually were guilty of starting shit and just one of us was complaining about it.

My father used to love saying: “It takes two to tango”

Contents:

• 49.5% chance estrogen
• 49.5% chance testosterone
• 1% chance strychnine

Spying on your competitors is as old as commerce itself

I think Lemmy needs to take a page from Reddit’s book and automatically link communities with something like “c/asklemmy”