I’m a weeb girl who’s fringe in a lot of ways. Please excuse my weird beliefs, I don’t bite :3

Political views: far left economics (socialism), conservative/traditional social views. I’m an ex-atheist, turned christian gnostic. I’m happy to chat. No hate, just pursuit of truth and proper living.

Hobbies/Interests: weebshit (anime/manga/japan), video games, romhacking, ai/tech, girly cute pink stuff, politics/religion is fun. I like the occult and conspiracy stuff too.

  • 0 Posts
  • 21 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle



  • A trademark is a name. The point is to remove ambiguity and confusion when multiple people are selling similar products. Ie to prevent name collision. Once the company or person is dead, there is no longer an issue. Having indefinite trademarks will mean we will eventually run out of names, as every name will eventually be taken over many years. By having them expire upon death, the trademark is freed up for reuse.

    Perhaps not have it immediately upon death though. I wouldn’t mind, say, a 200 year trademark, for instance. Trademarks aren’t preventing culture, they’re just clarifying names.

    Imagine if one person ever in history could be named “Joe”. Naturally during Joe’s life it’s useful to ensure no one else has his exact name. but after he’s been dead for 200 years? Do we really need to make sure no one else ever is named Joe?

    Look at the Atari situation. Atari is a company that is long gone and everyone knows it. However, companies are propping themselves up as atari because they own the Atari trademark. In the system of “someone holds their trademark even after death”, these new atari companies can’t call themselves atari. Is that good? bad? up for debate, but regardless no one is confusing them for the old classic atari (or maybe they are haha).

    But atari (the old company) surely isn’t being hurt by the confusion.




  • Copyright should be abolished entirely. But a reasonable length if it needs to exist is maybe 20 years. Think about stuff from 20 years ago. Movies like the first matrix, or games like the original super mario bros. These are classics, no longer something the creators rely on for profit, yet shape our culture.

    Copyright is used to harm culture for the sake of profit. An absurdly long copyright period can only harm society for the sake of shareholder profits. Ideally, things should enter the public domain at some point, and ideally at a time where the cultural impact can be felt. Anyone who disagrees with this should believe that disney is an illegitimate business, as almost all of their IPs are things originally in the public domain.

    If copyright as it is today existed back when disney started, we wouldn’t have beloved disney classics.














  • I’m of the opinion that the fediverse (and more specifically kbin) is my new home to talk about stuff. Reddit’s been in the news and on my mind, so why not talk about it? Talking about other platforms isn’t necessarily advocating for them. And people are gonna wanna talk about stuff. if not here, then where?

    I do think it’s important to encourage discussion of topics other than reddit, but to just avoid discussing reddit entirely? idk. Like I’d still talk about facebook, twitter, instagram, etc here if they’re relevant and in the news.