It has bad games 😎

What not playing ARMS does to a mf

Adolescent men would raid nearby tribes and kidnap their young women, which is the means by which genes were exchanged between tribes.

We see the misogynistic trends rise in late Hellenic periods

hmmm

1920x1200 is 16:10, and it’s pretty common. The Surface line uses 3:2, which is even closer.

it doesn’t contain secret hidden elements

You haven’t met many pirates, have you?

What the hell was that

I don’t necessarily disagree with you here, but

We don’t feel entitled to anything, we just don’t want every attempt we make to be marginalized and our artworks constantly stolen.

is contradictory. You believe that you are entitled to publish and distribute your work while retaining some control over how it is used. Again, I don’t disagree with that take, but you either feel as though you deserve something (be it payment, credit, control, or something else) for the art you disseminate, or you don’t.

It’s probably easier and more correct to make the argument that AI is capable of generating both original and derivative works, just like a human is.

A sufficiently large number of humans would be capable of performing the exact same calculations as a generative AI, a pokes a hole in the idea that it is incapable of generating original works. That being said, there does seem to be a subjective cutoff after which the generated work is no longer transformative. If I create some arbitrarily complex model that happens to recreate the latest Banksy given a specific prompt, to the point where replacing the model with Google Images would yield the same result, it’s difficult to see how the work shouldn’t be copyrighted.

I’m fine with this conclusion because it’s pretty much where we are now. As an artist, I could study a piece of art and (a) create something original based on what I see, or (b) imitate it as closely as possible, and if you think the result is too close to (b), you take it to court.

The fact that Android is not an “industrial OS” proves that Linux is not just an “industrial OS”. The fact that Android is an “OS not well suited to the average desktop user” does not prove that a Linux is an “OS not well suited to the average desktop user”, so of course I didn’t use it to prove that point.

Even so, you seem to take issue with the point that I did make. Is it, or is it not, “an industrial OS”? They’re your words, don’t come complaining to me because you chose them poorly.

Android also isn’t a viable consumer OS without the closed source Google Play Services bundle

This is patently false. The fact that Google Play isn’t even available in one of Android’s biggest markets, China, should have been a clue.

Bonus:

1. The average desktop user seems to be digging those newfangled Chromebooks. What say you about those devices?
2. Would you consider BSD to be “an industrial OS not suited for the average desktop user?” Because, cards on the table, the BSD and Linux kernels are quite similar in the grand scheme of things, and one of them has a 17% desktop/laptop market share.

Android obviously isn’t a good desktop operating system, but it doesn’t fit the description of

an industrial OS not well suited for the average desktop user

Android kind of disagrees with you though

Lol making up arguments in your head again?