Sure. That doesn’t mean smell isn’t telling us something though.

You realise this idea exists independently of decent hygiene, right?

Yes.

You’d think so, wouldn’t you?

https://biology.stackexchange.com/questions/39298/how-statistically-significant-was-the-sweaty-t-shirt-experiment

Wondering if this is an unpopular opinion: if you don’t like the unwashed smell of your partner then that’s your body telling you you’re not a good biological match.

You ain’t seen GP referrals.

I’m 60% certain my profession isn’t real, so we’re probably both right.

You’re god damn right.

It’s not an infarct either. It’s an extrinsic stenosis which, as depicted, wouldn’t be enough to cause thrombosis and even if it was tight enough - the thrombus would form downstream of the restriction until occlusion of the artery, rather than forming like a dam.

An infarct would be the damage to the tissue caused by ischaemia, as a result of loss of arterial supply.

What OP needs is an image of atherosclerosis, preferably in a coronary artery.