Promises promises.

As a guy (and i definitely speak for all guys), just scratch your crotch/balloon knot and jam your fingers in his mouth. Instant stiffy.

hmmm

If anyone is experiencing penis gluttony, hit me up.

I guess we’ll just have to agree to disagree.

So if I own a human as a pet, that’s cool? Two humans in this universe is the same as two dogs in that one. A marmoset isn’t a human. It’s not a proper comparison. If you see a human being led around on a leash in this universe there are two options. Usually in cartoon universes mammals are anthropomorphic and birds and fish are not but if you have a universe where dogs are anthropomorphic and one of them is being led around on a lead, that’s not right.

Ok, but a dog’s a dog. So in the case of pluto, it’s either a disability or pet play. Pick your poison.

Also why does Mickey Mouse keep Goofy’s intellectually disabled relative as a pet? It’s the sort of messed up thing I’d do, but not suitable for a children’s character.

I have absolutely no idea. I grabbed the first illustration that showed what I described (poorly).

A chefs knife will do for everything. Keep it sharp enough and it’ll even slice bread. As for the onion horizontal cuts are unnecessary. Offset radial cuts are fine (as you move away from the centre vertical cut you angle it more).

American for fruit and veg.

Yes! Hard same!

Who doesn’t like a bit of crazy?

I’m pretty sure they only mean birthright citizenship for non white people.

I think trump is more of a kazoo.

The reason Trump is talking about annexing Canada is that Musk wants him to. Musk’s mother is Canadian and born in Regina. This would make musk a natural born citizen of the United States and eligible to become president god emperor for life.

Bay of Tristan da Cunha.

If you find yourself on jury duty in a very specific case (you know which one) you should know about this but pretend like you don’t.

My point is that noone is looking at the IRA and crying mental illness. Furthermore, if you look at the Wikipedia pages for people like Anders Behring Breivik, Ted Kaczynski, and Timothy McVeigh, they all refer to them as terrorists. Whereas people like James Holmes are listed as mass murderers because their crimes were not politically motivated.

So if someone has a heart attack while driving and their car plows into a busy shopping street. Then whether or not they are regarded as a terrorist depends on whether or not someone tries to ban old people from driving because of it?

Or to ask a different question, how would you define terrorism? Because the Oxford English dictionary definition is:

“The calculated use of violence or threat of violence to inculcate fear. Terrorism is intended to coerce or intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.”

That last bit sort of discounts the majority of gun violence generally. And yes in terms of the result, it is splitting hairs. But, knowing the motivation behind a crime is important. You’re going to have more success preventing school shootings by investing in mental health services than you will in anti terrorism policing.

Also if two separate people wake up one morning and person A decides to kill the first person he sees. Person Bdecides to kill the first black person he sees. They both end up killing a black man, and both end up in prison. During rehabilitation, if you treat both as a hate crime, then you’re not properly addressing the violent impulses with person A and if you only address the violent behaviour then you aren’t addressing the underlying racism in person B. Motivation matters in how things are handled generally.