• 0 Posts
  • 15 Comments
Joined 4 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 27th, 2025

help-circle
  • Signtist@bookwyr.meto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonehistorule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 days ago

    It’s just “boymode” written to look old-timey. I haven’t been exposed to much trans lingo, and only know the definitions from context, but I think the MTF “Lord” said she was presenting as a boy but was seen as a girl anyway (male fail[eth]) and was happy.



  • Signtist@bookwyr.meto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneUS Discourse Rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 days ago

    Fair, I read the “should die” as “should be fought, and ultimately killed if necessary” rather than “should be rounded up and massacred.” I do think that the notion that people can change is more often used to excuse the bad deeds of unrepentant people than to actually redeem someone. Sure, people can change, and if they do, great, but if you avoid fighting them because you’re always holding out for a change that will never come, then you’re losing the chance you have to make real change.


  • Signtist@bookwyr.meto196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneUS Discourse Rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    13 days ago

    I do agree, and it’s the only solution for the paradox of tolerance. We tried the “make them stay quiet about their bigotry, and it will fade away” tactic already, and all it did was make the bigotry fester under the surface until it erupted into what we have today.

    If we overthrow the system and enact socialized medicine with therapy available to all citizens, maybe we could nip bigotry in the bud before it takes hold in a person’s soul, but once someone has decided to be intolerant, I believe it stays with them until they die.




  • Signtist@bookwyr.meto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonehypocrisy rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    I mean, sure, if someone is a republican and thinks book burning is bad it’d be hypocritical, but I’d be surprised if a significant amount of conservatives actually believe book burning is bad; it’s one of the classic forms of thought suppression, which is what they’re all about. They see the world shifting further and further away from their outdated hateful beliefs, and want nothing more than to force it back. It’s one of the largest drivers for their entire resurgence over the last decade.




  • Signtist@bookwyr.meto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    I wasn’t trying to discredit the validity of its use, I was trying to say that it’s valid specifically because it’s used. It doesn’t matter if you want to say “I’m figuratively dying of thirst.” or “I’m literally dying of thirst.” since they convey the same meaning, and are interpreted as such by the listener.


  • Signtist@bookwyr.meto196@lemmy.blahaj.zonerule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    I always felt like this was a weird argument. Language is always in flux. It’s why the definition of “literally” now includes a definition that it’s a synonym of “figuratively” since people used it that was so much.

    If enough people think gif should be pronounced like “god”, then it should. If the “jif” pronunciation has enough people who use it, then that’s valid, too. Hell, if a bunch of people started legitimately saying it should be a homonym with the word “plankton,” even that’d be valid.

    Words are about conveying meaning; the same meaning is intended with both pronunciations, and understood by the people hearing it. There’s nothing to argue about.