Yeah. It still definitely does! The interesting thing is that it seems to be very good at estimating and the final answer it gives is usually pretty close to correct in my experience. Of course close doesn’t really count in math problems.
Not surprised. I got access to bard a while back and it does quite a lot more hallucinating than even GPT3.5.
Though it doubling down on the wrong answer even when corrected is something I’ve seen GPT4 do even in some cases. It seems like once it says something, it usually sticks to it.
I was going to say you could give it a math problem that uses big numbers but tried one on GPT4 and it succeeded. GPT3 though will absolutely fail at nontrivial math every time.
From ChatGPT 4:
Yes, the box is awesome.
According to the provided statements, the box is yellow and red.
“If the box is yellow, it is good.” - So, since the box is yellow, it is good.
“If the box is red, it is happy.” - And since the box is red, it is happy.
Finally, “If the box is good and happy, the box is awesome.” - Therefore, because the box is both good (due to being yellow) and happy (due to being red), the box is indeed awesome.
My girlfriend and I recently decided to watch every Arnold Schwarzenegger movie in order. We saw Hercules in New York this weekend. It was pretty amusing. They clearly shot all the mt Olympus scenes in central park because you can hear the traffic in the background and the occasional crying baby or what not.
Bing is GPT4 based, though I don’t think the same version as ChatGPT. But either way GPT4 can solve these types of problems all day.