That doesn’t seem to apply to what you quoted, however. The section you quoted framed sex as a transactional obligation on the part of women, asserting that if women refuse to sleep with men who support their views and rights, they’ll become radicalized and turn into incels.

The logic in that statement is that men who care about women are entitled to a bit of quid pro quo, “I support your rights as a person and you have sex with me” even though that is entirely antithetical to the point.

If men care about women’s issues, then they are inherently fine with women making a conscious decision to not have sex. Otherwise, it means they don’t really care about women’s issues, and likely never did.

No one is shaming women for choosing to have sex with people they want to have sex with, just that the decision of those women who wish to stop having sex be respected.

No, I think the reply is appropriate enough. The comment you quoted is an extremely mysogynist take, falling right into the incel perspective of “if women refuse to have sex with men, they are inconsiderate.”

The value of women is not just for men to have sex with them—they have the agency to decide for themselves what they want to do with their own bodies. This is basically what the downvoted post is saying. Women choosing not to put out doesn’t “radicalize” incels any more than women showing a bit of skin creates rapists.

If there are men who can’t get over the fact that some women might choose not to have sex with them for political reasons, they can read Lysistrata or something.

All good. Admittedly weird times we’re in, like his presidency never even ended.

If only I knew what that censored word was supposed to be. Flaking? Fracking? Flocking? Forking?

The world will sadly never know.

2022 doesn’t sound right for Trump to be hosting anything at the white house. Was this at Mar a Lago or was this earlier during his presidency?

That is…something.

Careful EU, it’s contagious.

For me I liked it at first but ended up blocking it after it started doing “more stories like” which revealed that it was clearly there to turn a profit.

KenM moment:

I bet they could have made a smaller 3D print if they printed fewer floors.

Holy shit, I looked again and can’t believe the picture actually has a badly drawn key on the floor. I thought you were just pulling that out of nowhere.

A lot of good pizza out there that don’t use tomato as a base though. I love a good pesto pizza, and pesto uses all “old world” ingredients.

Just the tomato base really. There was still a lot of pizza-like food that predated the columbian exchange because I guess it doesn’t require much effort to invent “bread with stuff on it”

Those are gorgeous, thank you so much for sharing.

The real US president is the foreign oligarchs we made along the way.

I click the “More farten” button, what happens?

iOS uses Safari for webview and does not allow any other browsers, so other “browsers” you see on iOS are just Safari wrapped in different skins. That means their usual extensions wouldn’t work.

There’s a system-level content blocker feature that can block ads for Safari in iOS, but I don’t know if there is anything quite comparable to uBlock Origin available.

But if the ends attempt to meet at their current angle, the blue parts will touch and prevent proper insertion. One or the other will need to change their orientation for this to work.

I think it’s

1. Bed
2. Drive
3. Work
4. Bed
5. Drive
6. Work

I am assuming the implication is that this pattern repeats forever.

But having the ability to downvote bigots gives me a feeling of catharsis…

99% of it just comes from the same user so I ended up blocking them and no longer see any of it.

I didn’t want that outcome because I typically only block, like, scammers and bigots, but I’m just trying to curate my All feed and there was just so many moe posts divided across dozens of communities, it was like playing whack-a-mole.