How is a spectrum supposed to not have a total ordering? To me saying sth is a spectrum always invokes an image of being able to map to/represent the property as an interval (unbounded or bounded) which should always give it a total ordering right?
How is a spectrum supposed to not have a total ordering? To me saying sth is a spectrum always invokes an image of being able to map to/represent the property as an interval (unbounded or bounded) which should always give it a total ordering right?
Where is this from?
I love seeing conspiracy/crank types do anything with math.
For anyone who wants more, there is !possums@possumpat.io and !opossums@lemmy.world
I can kind of see what you mean. Maybe this more “natural”/less staged picture is less fake looking? (source)
Ig thats where most of my confusion comes from, to me saying sth is a “spectrum” always evokes sth along the lines of
gay <--------------------> straight
(ie one dimensional) with things mapping into this interval. But ig if you also include more than one axis in your meaning of “spectrum” there wouldn’t be as straight forward of an ordering for any given “spectrum”. + Like @saigot@lemmy.ca said technically even the 1 dimensional spectrum can have more than one order and the “obvious” one is just obvious because we are used to it from another context not because its specifically relevant to this situation.