As soon as my brain starts shutting down, I also feel like I Iook preeeetty good.
As soon as my brain starts shutting down, I also feel like I Iook preeeetty good.
“…the very idea of America may be lost…”
operative word being “idea” here.
they’ll lose their fantasy pre-civil rights pre awareness/tolerance madmen utopia.
I think it’s listed at the bottom there, Plantproof.com
Two mass shootings a day now in the US, it’s getting pretty competitive.
I scrolled down just a little before I looked at the picture and I was worried for a few seconds I hadn’t yet heard about some new major hell that had broken loose
Every inadequacy and anxiety, right?
Oh, i like that.
I’ve always seen it as you the penultimate step before a conclusion, but I dig infinity.
Hooo, way more, unfortunately, you are right on the money with the supreme Court f****** up civil rights.
I just think that this time it’s really at the peril of us stability.
Absolute executive power with immunity is the final step before complete actual and practical authoritarianism.
About to happen means already happened with this meme?
I didn’t know.
Ha, sorry, no offense was meant to you or the meme, it’s solid.
I meant the idea that the checks and balances were about to be completely destroyed was outdated.
The supreme Court already abolished the remainder of constitutional executive checks and balances, absolute executive power cripples US stability.
The reaper’s already in that fourth door, that meme is outdated.
I’ve been saying for years that the United States isn’t finished because the Constitution is still balanced.
Up until yesterday’s supreme Court decision, voting made a difference.
Absolute executive power could easily devolve into true US authoritarianism.
No, you inaccurately described evolution as design and then after admitting you meant evolution and definitively not design, rather than continuing the conversation and answering my questions, you are insisting on dithering that incorrect definitions are as valid as correct ones.
They are not.
You can keep trying to catch me though.
It’s fun, and it doesn’t seem like you have any compelling arguments about plants or animals not evolving to be eaten anyway.
Nice try, but you’re consistently using the same word to mean two radically different concepts so that you can hop between definitions.
“Let’s pretend pink means red and purple. Now, shirt number one is red and shirt number two is purple. They’re both pink, right?”
Inaccurately and for your personal definitions, yes. Both shirts are pink.
Accurately, no, one shirt is red and one shirt is purple.
If you have a point you want to make, make it accurately.
It’s okay if you used the wrong word the first time, say what you actually meant and move forward
You shouldn’t depend on using two definitions for one word in the same argument if you want to be taken seriously.
In your first use of “design”, you mean that deliberate effort was made to eugenically breed dogs to exhibit certain traits. That’s accurate.
In your original comment and your second use of “design” here, you mean “evolved” but inaccurately used the word “design” when you self-reportedly meant “evolved”, so I’m going to use the appropriate word “evolved” here instead.
Anthropomorphizing evolution doesn’t make evolution a simpler concept than evolution itself.
How do you mean that plants evolved to become food for something else?
Plants were around hundreds of millions of years before any animals showed up. Do you mean fungi?
Interesting take. How do you figure that?
I’ll go a step further and say that no animal was “designed”.
And the creatures weren’t designed to live industrially, so we have worse food obtained by harming the animals and the people involved in the process with unregulated animal husbandry and grocery prices.
praise jesus