I’d say draw a horizontal from the bottom of Idaho and call it “Dakota”

Dem great lakes tho

They could, and did, right in the title.

If you misgender my friends I’m going to identify as a problem.

This is better because was/were aren’t even pronouns

Zen Buddhism in a nutshell

Should be flipped, compare the “seen by both eyes” regions.

Jeez I dunno if we could get it any hotter for you, sorry

They also hunt other chimps for sport though

Nacho is short for Ignatio, the first name of the man who developed the dish consisting of tortilla chips, cheese, and jalapenos.

Interesting username for a cheese-hater.

Help your uncle Jack off a horse

Then your question becomes “Does intrinsic energy exist?” or “Does intrinsic existence exist?”

How would you define value, objectively?

Value according to who?

My interpretation of OP’s sentiment:

Western philosophy somewhat centers around the concept of Man as the intersection of the Rising Ape and Falling Angel. Through reason we can elevate ourselves above our base nature to become something More: more rational, more perfect, more in-line-with-the-divine.

Eastern philosophy somewhat centers around the concept of fundamental oneness. Through understanding we can reconcile ourselves with our base nature to become harmonious with our environment.

In short, Western transcendence comes from breaking free from our incidental conditions, and Eastern transcendence comes from acceptance of our initial conditions.

I believe this is something of an oversimplification, but I don’t think the “Noble Savage” interpretation is exclusively correct. There do seem to be methodological distinctions between Eastern and Western models of Enlightenment.

Of course. I was doing a joke you see, playing with the definition of “questionable” being colloquially equivalent to “doubtful or unreliable”.

The Secret is to not base your identity on questionable ideas.

Long pig

P E M D A S

vs

P E M/D A/S

The latter is correct, Multiplication/Division, and Addition/Subtraction each evaluate left to right (when not made unambiguous by Parentheses). I.e., 6÷2×3 = 9, not 1. That said, writing the expression in a way that leaves ambiguity is bad practice. Always use parentheses to group operations when ambiguity might arise.

Of course, but you should also vote for the lesser of two evils come election time.