Well, if she attacked him first it would be self-defense
Well, if she attacked him first it would be self-defense
I’d say draw a horizontal from the bottom of Idaho and call it “Dakota”
Dem great lakes tho
They could, and did, right in the title.
If you misgender my friends I’m going to identify as a problem.
This is better because was/were aren’t even pronouns
Should be flipped, compare the “seen by both eyes” regions.
Jeez I dunno if we could get it any hotter for you, sorry
They also hunt other chimps for sport though
Nacho is short for Ignatio, the first name of the man who developed the dish consisting of tortilla chips, cheese, and jalapenos.
Interesting username for a cheese-hater.
Help your uncle Jack off a horse
Then your question becomes “Does intrinsic energy exist?” or “Does intrinsic existence exist?”
How would you define value, objectively?
Value according to who?
My interpretation of OP’s sentiment:
Western philosophy somewhat centers around the concept of Man as the intersection of the Rising Ape and Falling Angel. Through reason we can elevate ourselves above our base nature to become something More: more rational, more perfect, more in-line-with-the-divine.
Eastern philosophy somewhat centers around the concept of fundamental oneness. Through understanding we can reconcile ourselves with our base nature to become harmonious with our environment.
In short, Western transcendence comes from breaking free from our incidental conditions, and Eastern transcendence comes from acceptance of our initial conditions.
I believe this is something of an oversimplification, but I don’t think the “Noble Savage” interpretation is exclusively correct. There do seem to be methodological distinctions between Eastern and Western models of Enlightenment.
Of course. I was doing a joke you see, playing with the definition of “questionable” being colloquially equivalent to “doubtful or unreliable”.
The Secret is to not base your identity on questionable ideas.
Long pig
Not immediately no, but I like to at least entertain the most charitable explanation when so little information is given.