I actually realized the misunderstanding and deleted my comment, but I guess the deletion hasn’t echoed over to all federated instances yet!

deleted by creator

Slightly older, more poetic version by author Dan Sheehan:

Surprisingly, no.

I’m here to help with my 20/20 vision.

fired at bootleg oyster ovary clown

yes masks parts? iPad u item golfers

of trio bargaining ♪ ohio mock grid

license E. Poe loiter

(and then there’s a picture of a silver glowing orb on a pedestal being prodded with a pair of chopsticks)

My abilities? Well, in all honesty they all come through the amulet I wear. I found it one day after killing a whole nest of gazulibirds (now long extinct). I put the thing on and suddenly my hair grew down to my waist!

Looks like your best bet is to raid every bird nest you can find until you find a Ying and Yang amulet.

Edit: ironic since they’re called Peta.

I think it’s a screenshot of something like Instagram or Twitter, where the original image is part of a carousel, and you’re seeing the little indicator that shows we’re on image 2/2.

The exact same image is used on the Game Rant socials, without the marker.

deleted by creator

Context of backplate tab:

I once worked supporting a guy who’d built a business intelligence system in an old dBase system that was restricted to 8.3 filenames.

The result of the filename length limitation is that almost every output file was suffixed with “anal” as a shorthand for “analysis”.

If he realized, he never let on.

That’s not the Lemmy approach:

looks like AI? no? comment “AI slop” on it anyway, just to cover your bases

That’s kind of the point.

I’ve not been to the States, but is drip coffee likely to get over-extracted (which is what we tend to describe as “burnt”)? I would have thought that it would be stale from sitting on the hot plate, and flat if the water’s from a reservoir, but probably under-extracted unless the water’s too hot to start.

Yeah, on this slightly newer table, the US is the 70th highest consumer of coffee per capita. The vast majority of European countries consume more dry coffee.

The imagery is still orthogonal, so you align things at street height with the map and ignore the roofs of buildings, etc. If you’re lucky, you’ll be working in an area that has cadastral maps with canonical alignment, so it’s easy to precisely adjust your aerial imagery.

Yeah, “perfect” is the enemy of “good”, for sure! I just think the mindset should be that any addition is as good as it can be for the level of detail that it’s being created to.

Inaccuracy is a problem. Not adding the buttresses on a church is fine, for example, but failing to align the map or allow for parallax creates real issues and it would have been better to just create a node.

One person can draw a simple square over a building, even if the shape doesn’t really match, and only add the tag building=yes. Then someone else can spend the time to make the shape more accurate.

To counterpoint: one misdrawn and misaligned building is a breeze to improve, but a hundred can be a real nightmare. You can end up with surrounding infrastructure “corrected” to the misaligned buildings.

Honestly, it’s funnier in the abstract.