The only thing I can think of for how they got to 77 is that the survey differentiates between meat, chicken and fish and the person making the graphic may have combined them into a single category. That would make more sense when trying to draw conclusions about dietary habits.

https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR375/FR375.pdf

Source, for those interested

This may well be true, but if you check the survey it’s not “have you ever eaten meat”, it’s “do you eat meat at least once per week”. It seems the idea is to track trends and habits.

fair, but people below the age of 15 are so heavily influenced by their families that to sample them is to essentially sample the parents twice. Given that, according to the source cited in the image, “NFHS-5 was designed to provide information on sexual behaviour;” sampling people below 15 or above 49 could lead to skewed results due to a tendency toward non-participation.

What’s really interesting about the survey is that it classifies fish as not being meat. It differentiates between houses that eat fish, houses that eat chicken or meat (guessing “meat” is beef, lamb, goat and pork in this context though of course that’s not exhaustive) or houses that eat all three.

https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR375/FR375.pdf

Here’s what you get when you google the source in the image. Hope this helps!

https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/FR375/FR375.pdf

Here’s what you get when you google the source in the image. Hope this helps!

the truly advanced sarcasm is in the comments

Another popular theory is that God created the entire universe, and that has made a lot of people very angry and is widely regarded as a Bad Move.

If the top makes you feel like Soyjack instead of Chad that’s on you. There’s no freedom like insignificance.