• 1 Post
  • 35 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 16th, 2023

help-circle


    1. Yeah, “Where’s the beef” is from 1984 (the year).
    2. In case you care, here’s a translation of that guy’s point: he was trying to make the case that the Mets made a good decision in letting go of the pitcher Nolan Ryan. His reasoning is that Ryan was personally very effective at striking out batters on the other team, but that Ryan’s team still lost about half the games he pitched. He goes on to say that getting a lot of strikeouts doesn’t matter. We now know, and many knew back in the 1980s, that a pitcher’s win/loss record is basically irrelevant, because you’re judging one guy’s performance based on how well the other 8+ dudes on his team do. Also, strikeouts are very important. He got it totally and completely wrong, Nolan Ryan is in the top 10 of best pitchers of all time, and the Mets haven’t won the world series since 1986 anyway so it’s not like they substantially upgraded when they got rid of him. Basically, imagine somebody saying Natalie Portman is a mediocre actress just because the Star Wars prequels were bad.





  • Also, we were were cringeworthy than they are now. I was there in the late '90s and the early 2000s. I remember the forum posts, the livejournal drama, the unfunny memes, the rise of MySpace. The Xanga sites alone were far more cringeworthy than Tumblr ever was, even if you ignore the underage nudes AND early 2000s fanfiction that people posted on their Xanga pages it was still worse. At least zoomers don’t have emo hair and post about their angst in the form of shitty poetry with handles like xXx_darkbl4de_st0rmwind_xXx, and those of us born in the mid '80s through the early '90s cannot always say the same.


  • This would be better than what they currently do, which is just upsetting. For example, let’s make a water-type panda Pokémon:

    1. cute blue panda cub
    2. darker blue panda, slightly bigger and with longer limbs, with lame attempt at giving it “attitude”
    3. somebody’s blue panda fursona with abs, pecs, and a crotch bulge

    or
    3. somebody’s blue panda fursona with Pixar mom hips and a bust with a fur tuft on it








  • I don’t know kid, I don’t think you have the balls to be part of our group, we’re not like everyone else, we’re special, we’re… edgy memelords. You see, kid, you’ve been raised in what we like to call the “normie-sphere”, where the memes are harmless, they’re mere comical observations of our daily lifestyles, they take no risks. In our group we take risks everyday, our humor knows no limits, we’ll make fun of everyone and everything! The Holocaust, the 9/11 attacks, Harambe… yeah, that’s right, we even make jokes about that gorilla who was shot, isn’t that insensitive? We don’t care, though. We feel no sympathy anymore, our hearts are cold and our souls are dark, there’s a void in my body that can only be filled with memes, DARK memes. You know, sometimes I wish I was normal, I wish I could laugh at these normie-tier memes, be an ordinary person for once… But I know that will never happen. My mind has been exposed to so many school shooting jokes and self-deprecation humor that I have become desensitized to plebeian entertainment. Kid, consider carefully if you really want to be one of us, there’s too much at stake, once you’re in you can never go back, NEVER.



  • I was attracted by it in the beginning because they were talking about things I was interested in: somebody who had personal relationships with game journalists was given good reviews for their shitty game, certain sanctioned video game sites appeared to be forming anti-competition cartels to eliminate up-and-comers, publishers were clearly trying to capture/recuperate the consumer reporting industry with review embargoes and sponsored reviews, etc. To me, the big looming questions were stuff like “can journalism ethically report on the industry they sell ad space to?” and “was it an isolated instance that Jeff Gerstmann got fired from Gamespot over his review of Kane & Lynch, or was it a symptom of a widespread culture of bought-and-paid-for review scores?”.

    And then I checked out what other people were worried about, and it was brain-meltingly stupid. And I don’t just mean the eternal dogpiling on Zoe Quinn long after it had become apparent that she was a relatively minor player in amuch larger game. They became obsessed with nobodies like Anita Sarkisian and other agitprop “internet personalities” on both sides, all of whom seemed exclusively concerned with clout chasing. It became a massive glut of creepy stalking, neofascism, and eventually flopped around till it landed on Red Pill shit.

    It all accomplished nothing except poisoning the phrase “ethics in gaming journalism”, when industry and special-interest capture of journalism is a threat in all sectors, not even just entertainment. And that’s not even mentioning the anti-competitive practices in the industry itself—imagine if a film rewiewer got blackballed from every major publication in their entire industry because they gave an Avengers movie 2 stars. Now bringing that up associates you with neo-nazis. Thanks gamergaters, thanks for the mulitple times I’ve been accused of being alt-right for saying Kotaku sucks.



  • Maybe some people don’t want to dismantle gender norms or the patriarchy, though. Perhaps instead they want to become someone who is oppressed by the patriarchy. Like, just speculating, maybe they want to be completely submissive and borderline airheaded, and be dressed in tighty, girly clothes, wearing lots of makeup and expensive hardos. Maybe they just want to have bleach-blonde hair and be completely and totally bimboified and have massive tits that can’t stay in the apron I wear in the kitchen.