

I think this is the best they could say though, I’m not sure what you’re going for. From where I stand, it sounds great (implementation is different, but when dealing with them all we have is their word for now).
They said “If they see somebody being assaulted unlawfully or attacked unlawfully or otherwise having their legal rights violated, we do not expect state and local law enforcement officers to simply watch or do nothing.”
What did you want them to say? They are expected to watch or do nothing? They can’t mandate that they will, at least our AG/Gov can’t, that’s not really in their power to so, instead they’re setting expectations in the best way they can.
And yes, public spaces. Do you want them coming into private spaces? Were they supposed to say that? That also would be a horrid thing for them to say “They’ll be coming to your private spaces”.
I really don’t think this is saying what you think it is.







Yeah they claim it’s for the trees but we’ve heard that argument before. They don’t give a damn about the trees. If that was the case they’d be trying to limit the sprawl of the city down in enumclaw and Puyallup. They just don’t want more density around them.