𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍

I think the IRL searches are much less pleasant than you might expect. There are no safe words.

I suppose she could be a hardcore masochist :shrug:

Yeah, don’t do that unless you want a body cavity search. Never, ever, say the word “bomb,” in any context, in a US airport. I suspect other countrys’ airport security are just as paranoid, but I know the US’s are.

Man, imagine being a kid seeing this happen. It’d either be a cool memory, or lifelong psychological trauma.

Bestiality, at least; the name doesn’t necessarily imply vore, though.

I haven’t been on Reddit in years; did they change the rules? Vote manipulation, or encouraging it, is still an account ban offense, right?

Psh, I can get that wish for free by just drinking water and eating seafood.

Got anything else?

A metaphysical orb? The abstract, post-modern concept of orb-ness?

Very avant-garde.

I think this would actually make a good candidate for a remake, with modern FX. It had some unique concepts that haven’t been copied into the ground.

Something something circles ≠ spheres cue laughter

I mean… OK. But basketball? 😑

Basketball‽‽ How can you even call yourself a Brazilian?

I used to only like Brazil, but with this picture, I now love Brazil.

Germany’s my usual favorite, but I’ll be rooting for you in the '26 world cup.

Oh, yeah; that’s a good one. I’ve read sci-fi books that are almost this, but less obvious about it; Libertarian wet dreams. I mean, fair enough, there’s plenty of communist fiction. But sometimes it gets a bit absurd.

One of my favorite all-time sci-fi trilogies is The Golden Age trilogy by John C. Wright. And it’s a sort of libertarian fantasy: übermensch against the forces of evil (which aren’t socialists; it’s not that kind of libertarian fantasy) who triumphs mainly by force of sheer will. Great books, and I think the ending is about the best I could imagine, because it inverts the entire libertarian message. The libertarian ideal society exists because The Gods allow it to. It’s kind of like Anarchy Park in whichever Larry Niven book that was: anything goes, except violation of other’s freedom, all enforced by all-mighty AI cops. It’s such a funny caveat.

Incidentally, I didn’t know about that Prisoners Dilemma strategy; thanks! I learned something new today.

I believe this is the article that kicked off support for the idea. Thankfully it’s not a Medium-requires-an-account article

Thank you, that’s one I’m going to read.

“Toxic masculinity,” for instance, a lot of people misunderstand to mean that masculinity is toxic.

Whatt‽‽ ϞϞ(๑⚈ ○ ⚈๑) I thought I was practicing the non toxic version of masculinity!

But I don’t know if this challenge to them is the same as a challenge to Popper.

Well, thanks for the link, in any case. My reading comprehension and analytic skills aren’t completely undeveloped, and while I’ve been known to fall for brief periods for clever sounding schemes*, I’m generally skeptical enough to read between the lines.

I think I have to admit I don’t actually know what Popper has to say on the matter. Though, I get the impression these two authors might agree, at least broadly, and are simply viewing the same problem through different lenses.

He wasn’t the first, but he was the first to really coin the term that stuck. It’s hard to read, if for no other reason than it’s philosophy and my eyes tend to glaze over.

That is, resolving the paradox might be interesting to someone if paradoxes bother them

Yeah, I think it’s a paradox only to absolutists, and I distrust absolutists. There are physical laws of nature that are absolute, and even then we find exceptions; but trying to hold to philosophical absolutes leads to people like Ayn Rand, and Libertarians. So, to paraphrase possibly the best scene in any movie ever, “the code is more what you call guidelines, than actual rules”.

• I once thought flat tax was a great idea, believing it’d get us closer to European-style “finally I don’t have to sorry about this shit for two while months every year” taxes; before a friend pointed out the disproportionate impact a flat tax has on different economic stratuses. Stratusi? Whatever.

Is there a source for that response? It sounds good, and I’d like to read a reasoned argument for the paraphrase.

That’s a decent solution. I was referring to The Paradox of Tolerance. You can disagree with Popper, but it’ll take more that a couple of sentences in Lemme to convince me.

So, you’re on favor of enslaving robots.

Duly noted, H-#1D0146641.

My problem is that I absolutely loath gardening. I love the gardens; I hate the upkeep. Weeding, tending, watering, repotting, fertilizing, pruning… I’d rather clean toilets. It’s so hard on my back, I’m miserable being outside when it’s hot or humid, and we don’t control the weather.

Someone’s taking care of all that. It’s lovely… if it’s someone else.

The Paradox of Tolerance says intolerance must not be tolerated.

Crush them. Brutally, if necessary.

That only means there are whole generations who haven’t yet seen it!