One of the rare cases where the headline turns out to be a severe understatement of the actual details
You’re arguing that sexual orientation can be trained or influenced by our media, which is the exact argument that the Conservative right has been using to ban books (and everything else). It’s also an argument that has been proven groundless time and time again.
NSFW: Would this raise eyebrows if your colleagues saw it.
NSFW tag?
Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good. Would you rather things stayed as they were?