AI authentication tools are built without adequate journalist input, new report finds
www.niemanlab.org
It has never been easier (or cheaper) to fake and alter media. The evidence that journalists rely on to verify facts — photographs, videos, documents, websites, and even audio calls with sources — can now be convincingly generated with AI. In June, dozens of journalists, technologists, and a…

The reason this is important and timely is because the messaging around these tools implicitly suggests there is an air of authority and integrity it would be impossible for them to have given that no journalists have examined and analyzed the mechanisms of these tools at any stage of their development.

  • mlfh@lm.mlfh.orgEnglish
    61·
    4 hours ago

    The post title and body don’t make this clear, but “AI authentication tools” in this context refers to tools that verify the authenticity of journalistic image and video media to confirm they’re not AI-generated.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.caEnglish
      51·
      3 hours ago

      Yeah, this could have been worded better… Maybe the post title and body were AI generated?

      • mlfh@lm.mlfh.orgEnglish
        41·
        3 hours ago

        I suspected as much, but I’ll need to consult a journalist to be sure

    • Hawke@lemmy.worldEnglish
      11·
      4 hours ago

      It’s also not a commonly-used term. “AI authentication” mostly refers to using machine-learning AI as an authentication method (eg image recognition, behavior observation, etc.)

      This sounds more like just “fact checking”.