Image Transcription:

A tweet from the George Takei Twitter account which states:

"A Democrat was in the White House when my family was sent to the internment camps in 1941. It was an egregious violation of our human and civil rights.

It would have been understandable if people like me said they’d never vote for a Democrat again, given what had been done to us.

But being a liberal, being a progressive, means being able to look past my own grievances and concerns and think of the greater good. It means working from within the Democratic party to make it better, even when it has betrayed its values.

I went on to campaign for Adlai Stevenson when I became an adult. I marched for civil rights and had the honor of meeting Dr. Martin Luther King. I fought for redress for my community and have spent my life ensuring that America understood that we could not betray our Constitution in such a way ever again.

Bill Clinton broke my heart when he signed DOMA into law. It was a slap in the face to the LGBTQ community. And I knew that we still had much work to do. But I voted for him again in 1996 despite my misgivings, because the alternative was far worse. And my obligation as a citizen was to help choose the best leader for it, not to check out by not voting out of anger or protest.

There is no leader who will make the decision you want her or him to make 100 percent of the time. Your vote is a tool of hope for a better world. Use it wisely, for it is precious. Use it for others, for they are in need of your support, too."

End Transcription.

The last paragraph I find particularly powerful and something more people really should take into account.

  • mydude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    My father beat me when I was a kid, he ran for child services president and I voted for him. I heard that the other guy beat his kids more, so I really had a moral duty to vote for my dad. You guys, it’s really important to vote for the guy who beats his kids less.

    • spookedbyroaches@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      My local mayor wants to increase funding for the public transit, but he didn’t say ACAB, so I’m not gonna vote for him even if the other other guy is gonna slash the public transit funding by half 😤😤

      • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        You make a good point.

        The person you responded to also makes a good point.

        There’s no one-size-fits-all (all voters or all elections) solution on this one.

        All we can ultimately do is encourage our fellow voters to open their minds, learn all they can about the issues and candidates, and make the best use they feel they can with their right to vote.

        Shaming someone for not voting for your candidate is a great way to repel them from your camp long term. Respecting their decision, even if you disagree with it, sets a much better example of the sort of level-headedness you’d likely want people to associate with your causes.

        • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Does shaming people for saying slurs repel them from your camp long term?

          Is it acceptable to respect someone’s decision to say r*ard because it sets a better example of the kind of level-headedness the anti-slurs camp wants people to associate them with?

          Like it or not, shame, not fitting in with the group, is a motivating force.

      • Faresh@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        How? It is exactly what it sounds like when people say to vote for the “lesser evil”, especially in this post.

        • Kool_Newt@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It is exactly what it sounds like when people say to vote for the “lesser evil”

          You do realize that if you don’t get the"lesser evil" what you get in fact is “more evil” right? We don’t default to “not evil” by not choosing.

          (edit) People that say this often seem to think the choice is between (A) Choosing one of the evils (B) Revolution that ends capitalism and sets up communism.

          • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Voting for the lesser evil is still voting for evil. Those who find it morally acceptable to legitimize evil out of fear are called “cowards”.

            • Pluckerpluck@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I guess it’s fine to be responsible for letting the greater evil into power as long as you can tell yourself that you were morally correct at the end of the day. Because that’s what you’re doing. You’re making a selfish moral point, and in turn actively increase the odds of a worse outcome. You feel better about yourself at the expense of everyone (including yourself).

              Because what do you even gain by not voting here? The moral high ground? You just make it look like the greater evil is more desirable. At least spoil your ballot, so that it counts in the percentages…

              • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                “Letting” the greater evil take power is what happens when you choose to acquiesce to the carrot and stick. Regardless of the outcome, your participation legitimizes the false choice, gives the the lesser evil no incentive to reform, and the greater evil all incentive to push further in the future. No matter who wins, “Worse outcomes” are inevitable.

                The one making a “selfish moral point” is you, who argues in defense of evil because you fear the consequences of even the mildest rebellion against the Empire more than the cost of living under it.

                If you want me to vote for Democrats, then you’re talking to the wrong person. Call your reps amd convince them to form a Truth and Reconciliation Commission as a bare-minimum first step towards reform and they’ll have my support.

                • Kool_Newt@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  your participation legitimizes the false choice

                  No, it doesn’t, this is a silly nonsensical argument. We are forced into this system and a voter can neither legitimize nor de-legitimize it to anyone except themselves or maybe their simps. Regardless of whether you participate in the voting, your going to get the consequences. A prisoner isn’t effectively fighting the system by refusing to choose their dinner option and ending up with kitchen floor slop.

                  • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Likening the American election system to a prisoner’s choice of dinner is probably a lot more apt than you intended.

                    But to follow along with your metaphor, a prisoner does effectively fight the system by refusing to submit to prison slavery. Instead of providing extremely cheap labor and driving down non-slave wages, they become a drain on the finances of the prison system that is still obligated to provide them with kitchen floor slop.

                    Participation in prison slavery, on the other hand, renders them complicit in their own imprisonment. Sure, they might be paid pennies on the dollar for their labor, but the vast majority of the value they create goes to offsetting the cost of keeping them locked up and fattening the profit margins of companies that rent convicts, providing financial incentives to further perpetuate the prison slavery system.

              • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Lol, thanks for continuing to legitimize the Empire I guess. You’re really sticking it to those fascists by adding your voice to the implied consent of the governed. 🙄

            • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              Not voting for the lesser evil is very much akin to supporting the greater evil because the greater evil is receiving a larger share of votes.

              Who would you vote for: Adolf Hitler or some person who stole a child’s lollypop once, who seeks to improve everyone’s lifes? According to you, voting for neither would be the best since you’d be legitimizing evil eithet way.

              • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Do the Democrats have a candidate whose worst feature is a single incidence of baby-robbing, or are they just going to run war criminals for office again?

                The Democrats have a year to sort themselves out, but so many people in these comments seem to assume that they won’t even try. Its weird that all these supposed Democrat voters have such little faith in the party that they’d rather try and persuade me to vote blue no matter who than call their reps and demand they do better.

                • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Considering Republicans don’t have literally Hitler as the candidate (just Hitler lite™), my comment was meant to be hyperbolic.

                  And honestly, does anyone think there’ll be any meaningful change? Are you optimistic they’ll change?

                  Besides, I’m not even American, I couldn’t possibly vote Democrat. Though I could vote Republican funnily enough.

                  As Americans, due to the influence of your country you have more responsibility than many other people on this planet.

                  The climate will not survive another four years of Trump.

            • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              Frederick Douglas was legally barred from voting. He still worked for politicians who wouldn’t promise to end slavery. Was he a dupe? Are you more moral than he was?

              • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                When criticized on that point by abolitionists, Frederick Douglass is quoted, “I would unite with anybody to do right and with nobody to do wrong.”

                I think that rather succinctly describes my criteria for judging the candidates next year.

                • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  So, you’re going to unite with Trump. Kissinger always explained that he’d had to kill all those Asians in order to prevent WW3. Henry would be proud of your logic, Frederick not so much.

            • Kool_Newt@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Option C – Hold your nose and vote for the least right wing choices available and work your ass off to build community and independence from capitalist systems.

              We should probably join with the UAW and their plans for a general strike in 2028. Prepare to survive without grocery stores or a job for 1 year by working with neighbors. Anyone talking about any sort of revolution without thinking about how 350 million people that are currently 100% dependent on capitalist systems people are going to eat when the supply chains break and stores shutter is being childish.

        • nul9o9@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If there was absolutely no chance for some one other than the two child beaters getting elected, then it would make sense. But that’s not the case for the US presidency.

      • mydude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        If the politicians can’t give people something to vote FOR, then they don’t deserve our vote. Come get my vote, thats how politics work.