(⬤ᴥ⬤)@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · edit-26 months agothe source ain't the only thing openNSFWlemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1162arrow-down10
arrow-up1162arrow-down1imagethe source ain't the only thing openNSFWlemmy.blahaj.zone(⬤ᴥ⬤)@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · edit-26 months agomessage-square21fedilink
minus-squarejanNatan@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7·6 months agohttps://www.gimp.org/about/splash/unstable-2.7.html It would seem not.
minus-square(⬤ᴥ⬤)@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·6 months agoit is, just for the development version tho
minus-squareAatube@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoThe 2.7.x series is comprised entirely of development versions. In GIMP, odd feature versions are developmental and even feature versions are stable
minus-squarejanNatan@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoDo the development versions have a history of having more risqué splash screens? Is there a list of them somewhere?
minus-square(⬤ᴥ⬤)@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up12·6 months agothe hunt for the gimp smut beings
minus-squareAatube@kbin.melroy.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-26 months agoBut 2.7.2 exists and isn’t listed.
https://www.gimp.org/about/splash/unstable-2.7.html
It would seem not.
it is, just for the development version tho
The 2.7.x series is comprised entirely of development versions. In GIMP, odd feature versions are developmental and even feature versions are stable
oh, didn’t know that
Do the development versions have a history of having more risqué splash screens? Is there a list of them somewhere?
the hunt for the gimp smut beings
But 2.7.2 exists and isn’t listed.