coffee_whatever@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 months agorulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1748arrow-down10
arrow-up1748arrow-down1imagerulelemmy.worldcoffee_whatever@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 months agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-squareCethin@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·edit-24 months agoIn reality, the arbiter is a private official who is being paid by the corporation. It doesn’t seem great for business if they side against them…
minus-squarep3n@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 months agoThis is true, but it wouldn’t actually be the first time that an arbiter gave an unfavorable result to its employer: https://youtu.be/u9Jmi9BOBNA?si=mOEPKERF8Z8YFrOi&t=8m38s
In reality, the arbiter is a private official who is being paid by the corporation. It doesn’t seem great for business if they side against them…
This is true, but it wouldn’t actually be the first time that an arbiter gave an unfavorable result to its employer: https://youtu.be/u9Jmi9BOBNA?si=mOEPKERF8Z8YFrOi&t=8m38s