• phario@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know it’s largely made up for parody but the teacher’s point is true. The “student” showed no work, but rather used an unexplained and underived formula.

    But yeah “ha ha—teacher so stupid”

    • HKPiax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s the relativistic velocity addition formula, which makes zero sense in non-relativistic scenarios, but it’s useful because it caps the velocity addition to just below c.

      EDIT: I misread. Yeah, even if correct you can’t just write down a formula and use it without justifying what it does or where it comes from.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        even if correct you can’t just write down a formula and use it without justifying what it does or where it comes from

        Of course you can, if the formula is well-known and its applicability is obvious. To use a question a bit more at the appropriate level, if the question was “Justin was sitting on a bus travelling at 50 mph. He has been moving for 12 minutes, how far has he travelled?” you wouldn’t expect the student to write “the formula to calculate distance given speed and time is speed x time, therefore distance = 50 x 1/5 = 10 miles”.

        No, you’d just expect “distance = 50 x 1/5 = 10 miles”. Or maybe at most “distance = speed x time = 50 x 1/5 = 10 miles”, but even that is overkill if the student has demonstrated understanding via the former.

        • HKPiax@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You’re absolutely right. I probably should have specified that in this context, that formula comes completely out of the blue and is not really appropriate, so I feel like in this case it warrants a bit of explanation.