They’d probably argue that what they choose to lock up is based on quantity lost rather than value lost, which is how they justify locking up things like laundry detergent and condoms. This justification completely ignores the glaringly obvious connection between the items that are commonly stolen: they’re necessities.
Aren’t they rather cheap? I don’t get what the point of that would be
They’d probably argue that what they choose to lock up is based on quantity lost rather than value lost, which is how they justify locking up things like laundry detergent and condoms. This justification completely ignores the glaringly obvious connection between the items that are commonly stolen: they’re necessities.