• piccolo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    I mean they could. But it would only solve one side. I dont think the original drafters envision using usb as a charging platform but a data transfer between thousands of different devices and host devices. I dont think they intended for most portable devices to have one side basically permanently fixed.

    For exampe for each mini and micro type B connected theres a mini and micro type A connector. But ive never seen one in the wild, but its suggestion the intention for the usb drafters.

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      I don’t think we’re talking about the same thing and I don’t know where the confusion is.

      Like when MicroUSB came out, I think charging was pretty standard. The cable can be a normal USB A to USB-something-that-is-reversible-like-USB-C-style, instead of the the USB micro.

      • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        Like when MicroUSB came out, I think charging was pretty standard.

        not really, in 2007, USB wasn’t even the main way to charge phones. most manufactures were using their proprietary connectors. I recall Nokia was using their barrel plug well until they sold to MS.

        • someguy3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 days ago

          I don’t mean micro was the standard way to charge, I mean that charging things was common. People wanted to charge things in 2007. And micro could be used to charge. Charging was a feature of micro.

          We’re really not talking the same language, I don’t know where the confusion is, so I think I’m gonna bow out.