• Soviet Snake@lemmygrad.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    All of the mighty US Wanderwuffe were destroyed or didn’t cause much in terms of advancing, and as all of you liberals like to say, Russia was using shitty goatherder Soviet weapons. Furthermore if you actually read the article you would see that the US is highly deindustrialised and cannot sustain a prolonged war and that’s not going to change because those are the effects of neoliberalism.

    In describing the outcome of the Congressional wargames, Rep. Mike Gallagher said that the U.S. used up almost all of its precision-guided missiles in a week. I assure you, China would not run out of missiles in a week.

    Guess what happens after a week? Besides if the US would invade China there would be no reason for Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, and plenty of other countries to provide support, I’d like to see how much your wunderwaffe will do there.

    • BROOT@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sorry, forgot I was replying to a totally badass amazing military strategist big brain boi. I’ll take my librul tearz and go home :(

      • Neodosa@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Will you address the claim made in the article which you clearly only read the headline of:

        In describing the outcome of the Congressional wargames, Rep. Mike Gallagher said that the U.S. used up almost all of its precision-guided missiles in a week. I assure you, China would not run out of missiles in a week.

        You seem to just assume that the US can somehow magically appear missiles into existance, but I mean think about it, is it the US or China that deindustrialized? Also, why does the US wargame conclude that at least two US aircraft carriers would be downed in the first two weeks?

        • BROOT@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          Where did I say that? There’s a whole lot of conjecture in your statement. Nothing in the article gives the vastly different rules of each of the war game scenarios they ran. Also, congressional war games are often utter and complete bullshit, run by people that have no idea how the American military and its supply chain and contractors operate. All I ever said was that I think this shit would be worse for China than for us.

          • Neodosa@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            How does the US losing two aircraft carriers and running out of missiles way before China equate to China being worse off than the US?

            • BROOT@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              1 year ago

              You understand that what I said implies that I don’t take at face value the validity of a CONGRESSIONAL war game run, right?

      • 新星 [he/him/CPC bot]@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        I tried to change my display name to “a totally badass amazing military strategist big brain boi” for the meme reply but I guess that was too long…

        In seriousness though, do you really think we’re responding to you for your “librul tearz”?

        • BROOT@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          That would have been an amazing name. And in serious? The person I responded to used ‘you liberals’ and ‘neoliberalism’ towards me, I was just mocking them.