god I hope it’s all of them.

WELCOME! It’s more fun here anyway.

I heard that the only cure is for us to kiss before our wives both get home. And then for them to kiss. And then for everyone to kiss. That way the gay germs will get totally confused.

You understand that what I said implies that I don’t take at face value the validity of a CONGRESSIONAL war game run, right?

Where did I say that? There’s a whole lot of conjecture in your statement. Nothing in the article gives the vastly different rules of each of the war game scenarios they ran. Also, congressional war games are often utter and complete bullshit, run by people that have no idea how the American military and its supply chain and contractors operate. All I ever said was that I think this shit would be worse for China than for us.

That would have been an amazing name. And in serious? The person I responded to used ‘you liberals’ and ‘neoliberalism’ towards me, I was just mocking them.

In my quickness to reply, I mixed up Patriot system with javelin. I didn’t mean that the UK were sending anti air, just that the UK once HAD a SMAA that was called a Javelin. Entirely my fault.

My bad, I misspoke. Us javelins are anti-tank. UK javelins were anti air.

Sorry, forgot I was replying to a totally badass amazing military strategist big brain boi. I’ll take my librul tearz and go home :(

Here Conscription Laws

Here Weapons

Here Military Structure

Any others you want?

You have to be kidding, right? A paper tiger? US javelins alone were responsible for utterly crippling the Russian air superiority.

I mean I don’t jive with the “USA #1” shit, but let’s be realistic. China has a military with both hardware and personnel structure built around Russian platforms and systems. About 35% of their current standing military is 2 year conscripts. We’re currently watching our hardware from 2-3 generations ago annihilate Russia in Ukraine. I think it’s safe to say that invading Taiwan would be WAY worse for China than for us.