• wildbus8979@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Actually the “massive health care reform” only further cemented private for profit health care instead of actually moving forward with a real solution: single payer. Sure it helped some people now, but it made the problem worst in the long run. It’s shortsighted at best, and malicious at worst.

    • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Single payer was never going pass in 2008. Not enough dems to break the filibuster, and they needed 9 republicans to jump across the aisle to get to 60 votes.

      If people voted in more dems, they’d be getting the healthcare plans that the rest of the modern world has.

      • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The first person to truly float insurance reform was a republican. Romney Care. The DEMs literally went no further than Republicans. That tells you how much they truly tried. Not a lot.

        • Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Insurance reform pushes are older than that. The democratic and republican healthcare reform plans from the Clinton era famously both had insurance reform as an element of the reform plans.

          The ACA does have similarities to the old Massachusetts plan, but it does go farther in a number of places. Employer mandates are a good example of that. That was an element taken from the old Clinton plan. Most in the GOP never liked that mandate.

          Given that most in the GOP moved pretty far to the right in the 15 years between the last national healthcare push, and the dems needed 9 GOP votes to get to 60 in the senate, what was the alternative? Most of the national GOP were basically for the “let the uninsured go bankrupt and die” plan.