• zurohki@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 days ago

    Kids these days don’t know the pain of trying to get enough free conventional memory to run something.

    • Christer Enfors@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      I was talking to a friend just the other day about that. I remember some application we used to reconfigure autoexec.bat to optimize it for one type of memory or the other, but I can’t remember the name of the application (I think it came with the OS), and I can’t remember what the different memory types were called either.

      • monotremata@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        IIRC the application was just “edit.com”, as in “edit autoexec.bat”. The different kinds of memory were expanded memory, extended memory, and the high memory area; high memory was useful regardless which of the other two you were using, and those two were for the most part kind of interchangeable. You also typically had to mess with config.sys, which handled some things like the mouse driver. It was really common to have specific floppy disks that had only those two files on them (well, and were set to be bootable), so that if you needed a particular configuration for some game–maybe you didn’t load the CD-ROM driver, since that took up a lot of precious low-memory kilobytes–you could leave your normal setup alone and just stick your custom boot disk in for that program. Some programs were really tricky to make enough room for, even if you had a ton of RAM, because that privileged low ram area was so hard to manage.

          • monotremata@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 days ago

            Ah, yeah, I think that may actually have been a paid program. It was something folks were willing to pay not to have to do, because, as I say, it was surprisingly tricky to manage the memory below 640K.

            • Christer Enfors@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              Well, at least in our case, it wasn’t something that we bought. I’m pretty sure it came with our MS-DOS.

              • monotremata@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 days ago

                Oh, you’re right, it’s right there in the link you shared–it was built in to MS-DOS, but only from version 6 on. I must have misremembered it as paid because it was something we didn’t have, and then later we did.

        • Christer Enfors@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          10 days ago

          That might have been one way of doing it, but I seem to remember a more mnemonic name - something like “memmaker,” perhaps?

          Edit: Yep, it was memmaker.