jayk@lemmy.ca to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year agoGoodbye T(rule)deaulemmy.caimagemessage-square5linkfedilinkarrow-up130arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up123arrow-down1imageGoodbye T(rule)deaulemmy.cajayk@lemmy.ca to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square5linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareT00l_shed@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up29arrow-down1·1 year agoJfc he wasn’t that bad. Infinitely better than what’s coming with pp
minus-squarejayk@lemmy.caOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down3·1 year agoDefinitely better in every way. But not good enough imo
minus-squareT00l_shed@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down3·1 year agoNo, not good enough. Politicians need to be held to a higher standard.
minus-squaremasterspace@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down4·1 year agoBy what historical measure are you basing that? Do you care to rank our prime ministers in order and see where he falls on that list? Because heres a hint: if you’re a leftist, then every single one of our prime ministers, ever, has not been good enough. In which case, you might want to reflect on whether there’s any overlap between the circles of good enough and electable.
Jfc he wasn’t that bad. Infinitely better than what’s coming with pp
Definitely better in every way. But not good enough imo
No, not good enough. Politicians need to be held to a higher standard.
(Laughs in USAian)
By what historical measure are you basing that?
Do you care to rank our prime ministers in order and see where he falls on that list?
Because heres a hint: if you’re a leftist, then every single one of our prime ministers, ever, has not been good enough.
In which case, you might want to reflect on whether there’s any overlap between the circles of good enough and electable.