This thread started because you asked someone to name a single nonviolent revolution. Such a thing cannot possibly exist, especially considering your inexplicably broad definition of that word.
You cannot seriously equate shooting someone with taking a child’s dessert away, simply because you consider them both to be violence. Considering this I’m a bit confused as to your point.
You have not quoted me once, you’ve projected your feelings into my statements and yet cannot explain which one you’re deriving your flawed opinion of me from.
I ask again, point to where I added my opinion on the matter.
What exactly is your point.
This thread started because you asked someone to name a single nonviolent revolution. Such a thing cannot possibly exist, especially considering your inexplicably broad definition of that word.
You cannot seriously equate shooting someone with taking a child’s dessert away, simply because you consider them both to be violence. Considering this I’m a bit confused as to your point.
That was my point.
Point to where I ever said or implied such a thing, please you don’t actually have a point without a quote you can reference.
So you aren’t presenting an opinion and your intent with this discussion was just to stir the pot for no reason.
Good to know I’m talking to a troll. Have a nice life.
I provided a statement of fact, if that’s stirring the pot to you then consider it stirred.
Not at all, I’ve responded in good faith, why you’re upset is beyond me.
I just did, and I stated it two replies ago.
You have not quoted me once, you’ve projected your feelings into my statements and yet cannot explain which one you’re deriving your flawed opinion of me from.