FfaerieOxide

they had to burn them.

They say that, don’t they?

Really I think the hassle is just worth less to the surgeon than to the patient so they’re incentivized to lie about it.

With how many religions insist adherents keep their parts for later burial (or other reasons) a patient liaison has to have a waiver in a drawer somewhere you can sign (Formalin is toxic) so they can return your bits or they’d have to deal with church funded lawsuits or at minimum bad PR.

I’m petty? You’re the one who’s keeping this going.

So much for leaving, huh?

This is a fight now

Only because you’re making it one.

Alright I can tell when a conversation isn’t productive anymore.

When you stop listening?

I explained very clearly why the implications of the position you took were harmful.

When did I say a doctor can override a patient?

“it’s between the individual and their doctor if they want to pursue medical things.”

It isn’t. It’s between an individual and their damn self.

I think the thrust of their point is it’s between the individual and their doctor if they want to pursue medical things.

And my point is it isn’t.

Saying, “It’s between an individual and their doctor.” implies there could be a time when a person wants to ingest something or do something to their body that affects nobody but them (vaccinations I still advocate the administration of at gunpoint) and they shouldn’t be allowed to because a doctor said no.

Doctors are their to advise, but not at the level of the individual to consent.

By all means keep antibiotics behind a key, but if a person wants to eat paint chips doctors should be there to monitor their blood for lead and explain why they maybe shouldn’t, not to stop them.

It’s between the trans person and their doctor

A trans person can shoot dutasteride directly into their eyeball if they want or gurgle horse urine against the specific advice of a physician and it would still be fine.

Downvoted for watermark.

Uber knows when you’re boinking, so I imagine your cell provider does too.

Guess what other technology I also don’t think should have panopticonic capabilities.

I’m also not seeing why two way communication requires measuring heart rates.

We can do all the cool shit tech does without the spying, those who " own " that tech just couldn’t monetize it as well.

Eh, people have choices in their watch wear

But people—all of them— have less choice when we normalize and allow to exist the sort of spy tech that can tell Apple (and apparently your family) when you are fucking.

it doesn’t mean it shouldn’t exist

That’s absolutely what it means.

They cooked that cat slowly in its own fat?

Why is there a watch that can tell when you’re fucking? Only thing it needs to tell is time.

In my case I misread “brand” for band.

A Tyre Inside?

Wait no, I’ve seen October Sky; I know where this is going.

You gonna smoke it?

What do you think smegma is and why would you presume you’d find any at the upper crack of this fellow’s ass?

From this picture, if anything the secret ingredient can be suspected to be doodoo chips.

I was over here thinking, “…fucking tape recorder?” but look at you being all scientific with emails and speech-to-text.

Korn rapping would be better than this.

You watching the car until she gets back or just …leaving your keys out unattended?