It’s a mix of both, really. They would not be losing significant time by actually going to the sidings and letting passenger trains go by, and time is less significant in freight anyway. The longer trains let them do some (fairly questionable) optimizations in their freight delivery though, and since they go unpunished, they go for it.

That’s true - they do this by making their trains longer than the sidings.

You’d think they’d make that illegal, but no. Political failures are incredibly common in the world of rail

That’s a problem that is easily solved by building less trains in places with no people and more trains in places with lots of people.

To be clear, the U.S has plenty of places that could easily support rail transit, and High-speed rail. That they are not getting built is just good old political failure.

Freight and passenger trains optimize for very different things, and those things are largely incompatible.

Passenger trains want speed, quick turnaround on the vehicles, frequent stops etc.

Freight wants efficient transport (= lower speed), few stops, turnaround time is less important.

That’s the joke

🎺

Google Keep works well enough if you don’t mind using Google software.

A towel.

I don’t take shits in the shower though, so there’s really no risk of me wiping shit on my towel when drying my ass after showering. The bidet is good, but won’t necessarily get everything 100% clean. Two squares of TP to get dry + ensure that everything is completely clean is a very cheap insurance policy.

I’m totally fine with just using two squares of paper to both get dry faster and to ensure that everything is fully clean post-bidet application, to be honest

and toilet paper should be banned

Are you just rocking a wet ass post-bidet application?

Oatmaxxing oatchad

I can barely imagine the level of pathetic you have to be to actually use one of these. Holy fucking shit

Well shit, that even predates the LLM boom.

Wild stuff

wat

In this case it was some banter against Brits, but yeah

Don’t risk your lives or limbs for the bosses, people

Appropriate that being in the UK is the negative option here

I mean, I’d probably do it server-side even if I were to have nefarious intent and want the data for myself anyway, since image processing client-side isn’t necessarily a good use of your users devices, really.

Plus, if I were to want the data in a client-side, I could upload it before doing the client-side stripping.

This comment doesn’t really hold up to scrutiny, my friend

Are you under the impression that this will pay any artist anything?

It’s fine to take a pro-piracy stance, but pretending that you’re doing it out of concern for the artists is grade A-bullshit.

Seems like an obvious UX issue - any collection expected to have more than a handful of elements should allow the user to filter that collection, in this instance probably using a search mechanism.