I’m a filthy fucking socialist.
Thank you.
So, the truncated version is for the US to go to war again.
You were educating me on things YOU (uncommitted campaign, et al) wanted. I can’t know without asking, and my Google Fu wasn’t providing specifics. No, I wasn’t being a Sea Lion.
As for scholars and the like, it seems like perhaps this whole event is in “good” hands, since they literally know the ins and outs better than the average citizen.
You seem like a logical person. I’d like to circle back to the Uncommitted thesis that Biden is in support of genocide, if you will. Since this is the crux of the whole voting campaign.
If you would allow me to ask 4 questions about this whole Uncommitted campaign:
What action(s) is Joe Biden doing that is a DIRECT support of genocide?
What action(s) is Joe Biden actively NOT doing that is a direct support of genocide?
What action(s) should Joe Biden BEGIN to do to that does not support genocide?
What action(s) should Joe Biden STOP doing right now to avoid supporting genocide?
I ask these 4 questions, because right now, I’m not seeing much actual definition of actions that define the support of genocide, nor the quelling of genocidal support.
Should he be sending troops? …talking? …cyber warfare? …sanctions? …carpet bombing? …ghosting? …written threats? …dehumanization? …assassination?
These are all examples of actions. There are more things, of course. But right now, I’m not seeing any clarification - no specificity - just absolutist rhetoric from the Uncommitted.
And I’d like to know more.
I see you’re voting for Fuckface 45. At least we know, now.
And you honestly don’t believe people aren’t going to keep this mentality up in November?
But he’s going to win via the Spoiler Effect if people keep this third party shit up.
A vote against Biden is a vote for Fuckface 45.
Until we get rid of First Past the Post voting, at least.
Uncommitted campaign is just a vote for Fuckface 45 in a trenchcoat.
It’s also not exactly untrue, either.
They live in a society where these things are taken care of by taxes, without greedy for-profit middlemen.
Uhh. I need to find my settings app, please!
Depends on the individual definition of skepticism.
Some people say, “hmm, I’m skeptical”, and then do nothing after. That’s not science. That’s denial.
Some people say, “hmm, I’m skeptical”, and then go look into stuff about that thing to make sure that the data they find confirmation or denies the thing they’re skeptical about. That’s science (the very very very beginning).
The difference between a million dollars and a billion dollars is about a billion dollars.
I’m 42, overweight, and poor. I’m an elderly middle-aged person who’s maybe got 20-25 years to go.
Which is why we need to a) increase electric car and grid potential, to choke them out, and b) increase better public transit with mixed zoning for easy-to-use cities.
While these are definitely big, and by no means easy to accomplish, solutions, they will help us move away from a car centric society that is hamstringed by oil.
Also, maybe some eco terrorists can help, but I’ll let them keep me out of the loop.
Ava then we get to party even more money at the pump when they feel like charging more. Despite us subsidizing them.
So let’s stop subsidizing oil.
Almost like God isn’t real and was made up by humans to control people.