I don’t get it…

It is once you climb over the giant ice wall hiding the flat earth.

But i = √-1 so it’s more like -itc you missed the h by the way -itch

bank you to.

We did that once, the top three all stopped, but then China, India and other took the place.

It’s just like I’ve been saying, people turn 19 and there like, na bra, I’m chill.

I want it in green.

Na, she can use the rest of her handle, at this point I think she’s just trying to avoid work, and it looks like you only touched one spot of the bottom of my screen make sure you touch it up.

She’s a Bitch, I hate her, If I don’t answer shell ruin my life but night after night I ask her to call again only for her to make me miserable again and again.

Ohio is nice this time of year and all the kids are taking about it.

Could you imagine living in Hawaii and not having readily available corn fields? How would I do all my corn field based activities?

If you can make it here you ca…. Oh someone killed you…

If I can make it here I ca…

I would argue that the people who showed up to vote is a perfectly random selection of people who would have shown up to vote if you extrapolate the numbers out under identical circumstances for each city town district state, etc , I would also concede that the sheer increase in voters would affect who votes, I would not how ever say this alters my conclusion because there is no way to know what way it would alter them making it another random variable.

That is why you would apply it to each district not the entire county.

It is obviously true with a 500/1 trillion ratio, but a 100/100,000 is a big difference and that is just the random number I chose the actual ratio is closer to 88/334 (88 million people who didn’t vote. 334 million population)

The 500/1 Trillion in the central limit theorem is the absolutely most optimistic exaggeration to prove a point, but it maintains true to a lesser effect when some variation is introduced.

I just assume anything overly verbose or well structured is Ai written and gloss over it.

No, that is true as long as all external factors remain constant, if X went off the air and suddenly we have a decrease of republican’s the ratio would change, however if both sides pushed harder and got more total voters it would stay consistent.

Oh no, that’s not what I’m saying at all, it is %100 biased but changing the total number of voters will not change which direction is biased to.

Yes but increasing the total amount of votes don’t affect the ratio

Statistically it doesn’t matter The central limit theorem, would allow for a sample size as small as 500 people randomly distributed to be an accurate representation of a group of trillions, it is a bit more complicated than that since the us is not random but carefully crafted districts, but as long as 50-100 people voted is each district or even the majority of districts then adding more people is just redundant.