• Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      Sources? Have googled a bit and couldn’t find anything that paints the artist as a pedo.

      I mean apart from the depiction of the characters, which is really weak as a confirmation of anything, seeing as a lot of Japanse works have the same questionable aesthetics.

      • NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        I’m not going to search too deep for the sake of my own eyes, but had seen reference to their other works in a post on reddit that go beyond “questionable aesthetics” and into straight up ‘that is a child’

          • NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            Im assuming by that you mean ‘if the people took issue with it’, not ‘if there was a cultural problem of pedo shit’ (not trying to argue semantics, I do agree that there is 100% a cultural problem with normalising that kind of thing)

            I’m only taking issue with you generalising a >120 MILLION population and labelling them as pedos

            • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              Bro, it’s Japan. If they (meaning rich Japanese men) don’t like it, it’s illegal to do. And they don’t like a lot of things.

              And I didn’t generalize 120 million people.

              I specifically made a claim about 30 million of them, the pedo ones.

              One of the things about Japan is that they tend to take community complaints relatively seriously. That’s admirable in certain ways, but what it also means is that you get anything illegalized if you’re enough of a Karen about it, from pedo merchandise to brown people existing.