• Pharmacokinetics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, the only thing that’s keeping linux from taking over desktop is unreliable gaming experience. Most distros are already easy to install and use anyway. If it had a gaming experience as smooth as Windows it would be the norm.

    • Hubi@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      117
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, the real reason is that Linux doesn’t come pre-installed on new devices. The average user doesn’t even know that you can install a different operating system. This is a much larger hurdle than the gaming experience.

    • EnderMB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      95
      ·
      1 year ago

      This isn’t even remotely accurate. The average person isn’t a PC gamer.

      The reason is because for the average person, Windows “works”. It works with the applications they know, it looks and acts like they remember, they can get it repaired, and there is zero incentive to change.

      Furthermore, Linux isn’t as user-friendly as Windows on the desktop. The average user doesn’t give a fuck about the terminal, privacy, ads, or any of the shit other people care about.

      When someone creates a distro that has 99% support for all Windows applications, zero maintenance, no need to ever touch a terminal or change a config file, and comes preinstalled on the crappy machines they buy from the supermarket, then Linux has a chance.

      • drathvedro@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        The average user does not use a variety of apps either. All they need is a browser, a rich text editor, a simple image editor, a video player and maybe a messenger. All but the browser can be effectively substituted by web apps nowadays, so the browser is pretty much the only thing they really need. But then, they’re better off with a chromebook, as it doesn’t offer as much options to brick itself.

          • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Numerous times I’ve heard Linux Mint be referred to as exactly this! :)

            The funny part is some distros like that are perfect for the other extreme that basically just needs a browser and maybe a way to write letters or print things.

            Mint is very GUI-heavy and tries to keep itself out of the box and simple to maintain while staying out of the way.

            …and tech support scammers have no idea what “a linux” is half the time, for added benefit. Lol

            • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              IMO Mint is more “Your Mum Can’t Brick This”. I wouldn’t hand it over to my grandma and expect to not get a call in the future saying it’s all gone to shit 😂

              • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ahh you have one of those truly destructive force-of-nature grandmas that no UX can stop from working over a system until it begs for a complete reformat!

                I feel for you <3

                … Maybe keep a remote access service like RustDesk handy if she’s more than a few miles away then. 😆

                … And install with BTRFS and Timeshift rollbacks.

                Haha but I’ve seen it posted multiple times: “I set them up with it and my phone stops ringing for tech support calls and they’re happy with it!” haha. Some like to learn, some don’t sadly.

                But YMMV, depending on the appetite for chaos wielded by one’s particular gran-gran. XD

        • GTG3000@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          The devil is usually in the details.

          OSS rich text editors work, but then you send out the document to someone who has Word and they complain about the formatting since it doesn’t translate some times. Messenger app experience usually goes “Native Windows > Web app > Linux”, at least in the few corporate I used. Stuff like Lark not even being up to date with their web app and Telegram having strange interactions with some window managers.

          It works and I gotten people to use raspberry pi instead of their windows computers, but it just feels very unpolished overall.

          And then there’s the whole package/flatpack/snap/cosmopolitan thing

      • u000@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        When someone creates a distro that has 99% support for all Windows applications

        This seems to be a common misunderstanding.
        It’s not that Linux doesn’t support Windows applications, it’s that the developers of those applications chose to only support Windows. They are different OSes that require executables targeting the platform.

        Expecting Linux to run .exes built for Windows is like expecting the sea to support your car

      • sunbytes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        “the norm” part isn’t accurate, but if it could match gaming performance/compatibility I know a lot of people who would switch. Myself included.

        And seeing as how 2% isn’t a very large percentage (but I think the number of gamers who are sick of windows, or have privacy concerns is quite large), I think it would be a notable increase in the userbase.

        Even an increase to 2.5% market share is a 25% boost. A lot of products would be very excited indeed to boost their market share by 25%.

        It might even light a tiny, tiny fire under Microsoft that they can’t just keep being shit with no consequences.

        Competition (sometimes) breeds innovation.

    • Tvkan@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re massively overestimating how many people care about gaming on their computers.

      • veroxii@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah exactly. The desktop stats are the way they are because of business machines mostly needing to run Ms Office. And no, open office etc is no substitute for excel. Yes maybe the most basic of spreadsheets but there are some monster sheets out there in most businesses which use excel only functionality.

        • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d argue that those “monster sheets” should not be on excel, but they will figure that out once they have transitioned to the cloud and then their important stuff isn’t accessible one day.

        • GTG3000@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah. I remember checking out scripting in Libre and when you put it next to Excel’s “just press here and write code”, it’s kind of bizzare.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’re massively overestimating how many people care about gaming on their computers.

        We’re all massively overestimating how many people care about their computers.

        Sigh ._.

      • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re right but it would still be a significant enough jump that it would be noticeable, nothing crazy like doubling or tripling numbers but definitely noticeable. Out of my 4 close friends 3 of us would be on Linux if it wasn’t for games.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not my experience at all. Most people I know who say they can’t use Linux do so because of professional software. Games on Linux have come a long way and unless you insist ob playing windows-only games, you have more games for a Linux than you could play in a lifetime.

      • bam13302@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        Even for games only released for Windows, with proton most of them work, its games with hardware tied intrusive DRM that are most of the ones that have any issue, and honestly, I have no issue boycotting that shit

      • voxel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        most games work but have minor annoying issues, even native linux versions.
        for example celeste has broken steam overlay (linux native game!!!) if running on amd gpus

    • sic_1@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      In my experience, gaming in Linux works even better than on Windows. Every game I installed so far was supported by proton.

      The main thing holding Linux back is professional software I think. If Photoshop and the likes are supported better, a lot of people will switch and find out that they also can play games on Linux.

      • numanair@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get better game performance in Linux, but I still use Windows mostly due to CAD software (just like you’re saying). I hope those companies see the value in developing for Linux, but I’m not sure the statistics are there to convince them yet. Chicken/egg problem?

          • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Don’t know about OP, but I have and do use FreeCAD regularly and it’s a fantastic piece of software - in it’s current form it’s not suitable for use a lot of professional engineering setups.

          • numanair@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve used Freecad for a few projects. It’s definitely usable, but the learning curve is really steep, even for someone who already knows other CAD. I don’t think the workflow/features are there yet for being able to use it professionally in most cases. It feels much more like an engineering tool than an industrial design tool, which is part of why I hold that opinion.

            I have not used Librecad. It’s 2D, right?

        • sic_1@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          For office, there are great alternatives, imho. LibreOffice, Thunderbird, Obsidian, to name a few. What functions do you need that these don’t offer?

          • boomzilla@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            OnlyOffice is mentioned so rarely but it has an UI much more resembling the ribbon based MS Office and in my experience a good compatibility with docx and xlsx files. Don’t know what’s happening when confronted with macro-monsters though.

            • sic_1@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It seems to format documents differently though. That means it scrambled a few files for a co-worker I sent it to who uses MS Office. Stuff like that never happens with LibreOffice although I like the OpenOffice UI better.

              • boomzilla@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ah thanks for letting me know. Scrambled sounds dire. Spreadsheets or documents?

                Thought the devs nailed it pretty good. At least I never saw differences in my not overly complicated letter layouts when I opened them in MS Office.

                Though I had your use-case just with a few rather simple spreadsheets I got from colleagues for me to modify and send back, they never complained.

                Anyways I’m glad I don’t have to do with office products very often but I’ll look into OpenOffice as well. Looks indeed very good. Like a streamlined and modern MS Office without ribbons.

    • soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is such a bubbled and disconnected opinion from the greater global population. Please be aware of that fact and don’t let yourself get so bubbled again

    • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, suddenly, its really good. Not seamless as windows currently is but so close. Like 80% of Steam.

      I’m on Nobara with KDE, which is based on Fedora but automatically comes with the proprietary drivers and some tweaks specifically for gaming.

    • Oisteink@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes - most of Microsoft and Apples income is from gamers. They are huge group compared to the business laptop market

    • cannache@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah although I agree that Linux is a huge sleeping giant, Microsoft systems in general still have a huge hold over quite a lot of things, and also does a good job of providing business as whole to a variety of sub groups, everyone that runs engineering software, antivirus software, hell, SQL databases, even the dating apps, and the creators of spywares, all these things work with Microsoft et al for money, if they had to switch over to using Linux, they would find the same ways they do today to make money, you would see huge increases in use of one common desktop and window manager package, spyware, hacking tools, targeting Qt, supply chain hacking and diversion, gitlab DDOSing, etc.

      The reality is that all of these things are things that Microsoft and partners has already had to consider and deal with, so if Ubuntu or Arch were to step into the mainstream marketplace even with OEM support, they would have to face the same scrutiny and problems which someone would eventually expect to have to get paid for to resolve it help out with.